News
Garber Announces Advisory Committee for Harvard Law School Dean Search
News
First Harvard Prize Book in Kosovo Established by Harvard Alumni
News
Ryan Murdock ’25 Remembered as Dedicated Advocate and Caring Friend
News
Harvard Faculty Appeal Temporary Suspensions From Widener Library
News
Man Who Managed Clients for High-End Cambridge Brothel Network Pleads Guilty
It is in the middle of “Selma” that I start to think about Harvard.
Later, I will tell my friend that I am glad that the movie did not shy away from the truth of our nation’s violence, that the fact that my great-great-grandparents were kicked and beaten and gassed is a truth that needs to be spoken. She will agree, tired of suffering being minimized.
They were assaulted.
They were bludgeoned.
They were spat on.
And in the middle of “Selma,” just before I start to think about my school, I think about how powerful hate is. How brazen and wrong they were, those people who used to live in my city, who used to infest my South.
They assaulted.
They bludgeoned.
They spat.
But I know, of course, that there is nothing past tense about it at all. I know that “Selma” is nothing old and Ferguson is nothing new. I know that, and I’ve known that, and yet, there is still something antiquated about that hate.
There is a way to dress and light an actor that makes it clear that they’re playing a bigot.
If lit and clothed correctly, you can tell that said character sleeps under a Confederate flag, and that they have once in the past seven years referred to President Obama as “our monkey leader,” and that the things they say will make you very, very unhappy.
From my personal film experience, that is how Hollywood does racism. If it is not a Black Film—e.g. “Selma”, “12 Years a Slave”— where the movie is explicitly about race as it was in history, and the racists are clear-cut and evil and ignorant and behind, then it is something else, something Urban or White Saviory—e.g. “The Blind Side”—or maybe it’s something else entirely, a metaphor, it’s “Avatar” or something.
Seldom is there a film explicitly about racial consciousness— e.g. “Crash.” I don’t have any white friends who have seen “Dear White People.” Back home, I don’t have any white friends who have even heard of “Dear White People.” In these movies, racists are only slightly veiled and the audience is challenged to examine underlying racist ideologies in both the characters and themselves. But I don’t think that’s entirely right, either.
In search of a more accurate portrayal of modern-day racists, something keeps leading me back to “Song of the South,” where unmistakable racism is presented as normal and is received as such by the audience. Racism operating at a level that is acceptable to the times, commonplace enough to be unspoken and uncontested. The kind of racism that furrows its brow at you, winces in the cheeks, raises its hands slightly: “Who, me?” Racism in a movie that is not about racism and not about race and not a Black movie. Racism that is—unarguably, unapologetically—just there.
Perhaps the primal scream conflict is tired, but did it get enough discussion initially? The day of primal scream, I overheard several White students behind me discussing, “Someone said that if it were all Black students streaking, the cops would get called.” “That’s dumb.” “That doesn’t make any sense. That’s not what it’s about.” That night, one group of students protested while another group streaked. We all know the story. Some students chose to make their voices heard.
They assaulted. (There were, in fact, reports of physical assault.)
They bludgeoned the silence with chants of “USA! USA! USA!”
They spat obscenities.
We've heard qualification. Perhaps the protest was poorly planned. Perhaps there was misunderstanding. But there is no misunderstanding that some students at this university took in the peaceful message of “Black Lives Matter” and responded less sad Sandra Bullock at the end of “Crash” and more boldface Joel Chandler Harris.
Hate is a powerful thing.
But it is also really, really sneaky.
There needs to be more conversation, but that’s been said. There needs to be more self-analysis, but that’s been said. There needs to be more dialogue and empathy, but that's been said. All of that has been said.
But selfishly, so selfishly, I cannot help but think about me.
In that movie theater I thought, “Even at Harvard.” But then I self-corrected, “Especially at Harvard.” Most days I think “Although at Harvard,” and though it is not the first thing on my mind, it is certainly there, and though I often personally think about and talk about race in classes or with friends, something about race at Harvard still seems so foggy.
And while I am struggling through this fog every day, it seems unfair, confusing, and concerning, that there are students who do not even think about it. And in that fog, if I let it get as dense and unclear and big as it truly could and perhaps should be, any kind of happiness becomes difficult, indistinct.
There is no resolution here. But at least, unlike back home in Georgia, where I have only ever had unforced conversations on race with my dad and the Black friend with whom I saw “Selma”, I can appreciate that I even recognize the fog here at all.
Madison E. Johnson ’18 lives in Wigglesworth Hall. Her column appears on alternate Wednesdays.
Want to keep up with breaking news? Subscribe to our email newsletter.