News

Ivy League to Consider Allowing Football Teams to Play in Postseason

News

Despite Resident Fears, City Officials Optimistic About Impact of Multifamily Zoning

News

Garber Announces Advisory Committee for Harvard Law School Dean Search

News

First Harvard Prize Book in Kosovo Established by Harvard Alumni

News

Ryan Murdock ’25 Remembered as Dedicated Advocate and Caring Friend

Editorials

Vote ‘Yes’ on Ballot Question 3 to Allow Rideshare Workers to Drive Change.

By Emily N. Dial
By The Crimson Editorial Board
This staff editorial solely represents the majority view of The Crimson Editorial Board. It is the product of discussions at regular Editorial Board meetings. In order to ensure the impartiality of our journalism, Crimson editors who choose to opine and vote at these meetings are not involved in the reporting of articles on similar topics.

From academic workers to residential advisors to student employees, our Board is proud to support organized labor on campus. Because all workers deserve a say in the terms of their employment, we call for a “yes” vote on Ballot Question 3.

The right to unionize is all the more important to rideshare industry gig workers, because they aren’t categorized as employees in Massachusetts, denying them the protections that come with that status. As a result, Uber and Lyft drivers nationwide report low pay, insufficient healthcare coverage, and workplace stress. It’s no wonder the Massachusetts attorney general successfully sued those companies for labor law violations, winning a settlement of $175 million and improvements to working conditions.

With a union, drivers can build on these victories and influence the terms of their work. The state government should not stand in their way.

Of course, the ballot measure is far from a panacea. Forming a union and building a representative leadership structure is no easy task, especially given the transient nature of gig work. But that’s not a reason for a government prohibition — it’s a challenge organizers stand ready to face.

This staff editorial solely represents the majority view of The Crimson Editorial Board. It is the product of discussions at regular Editorial Board meetings. In order to ensure the impartiality of our journalism, Crimson editors who choose to opine and vote at these meetings are not involved in the reporting of articles on similar topics.

Have a suggestion, question, or concern for The Crimson Editorial Board? Click here.

Want to keep up with breaking news? Subscribe to our email newsletter.

Want to keep up with breaking news? Subscribe to our email newsletter.

Tags
Editorials