News

Harvard Medical School Cancels Student Groups’ Pro-Palestine Vigil

News

Former FTC Chair Lina Khan Urges Democrats to Rethink Federal Agency Function at IOP Forum

News

Cyanobacteria Advisory Expected To Lift Before Head of the Charles Regatta

News

After QuOffice’s Closure, Its Staff Are No Longer Confidential Resources for Students Reporting Sexual Misconduct

News

Harvard Still On Track To Reach Fossil Fuel-Neutral Status by 2026, Sustainability Report Finds

Editorials

Don’t Trip. Vote ‘Yes’ on Ballot Question 4.

By Emily N. Dial
By The Crimson Editorial Board
This staff editorial solely represents the majority view of The Crimson Editorial Board. It is the product of discussions at regular Editorial Board meetings. In order to ensure the impartiality of our journalism, Crimson editors who choose to opine and vote at these meetings are not involved in the reporting of articles on similar topics.

As voters head to the polls to decide the future of psychedelic use in the state, they would be wise to remember that over five million people are estimated to use psychedelics. And yet — despite these numbers — no crises have erupted.

Given the relatively low risk of addiction or overdose, we shouldn’t expect catastrophe if this question passes. Citizens — including those who are underage — will continue using psychedelics regardless of whether or not they are explicitly legalized.

Furthermore, there are very real reasons to create safe pathways for psychedelic use. The National Institutes of Health has itself noted the medical benefits of certain psilocybin and MDMA in treating certain mental illnesses; the licensed centers proposed in this ballot question would provide a reasonable setting for users to take these drugs.

Decriminalization will both destigmatize drug usage and, most importantly, provide safe, regulated avenues for those who choose to use them. Voting “yes” on Ballot Question 4 will help achieve these goals.

This staff editorial solely represents the majority view of The Crimson Editorial Board. It is the product of discussions at regular Editorial Board meetings. In order to ensure the impartiality of our journalism, Crimson editors who choose to opine and vote at these meetings are not involved in the reporting of articles on similar topics.

Have a suggestion, question, or concern for The Crimson Editorial Board? Click here.

Want to keep up with breaking news? Subscribe to our email newsletter.

Want to keep up with breaking news? Subscribe to our email newsletter.

Tags
Editorials