News

Adams Replaced Its Racist Fireplace. Now, Harvard Wants It Gone for Good.

News

After Diversity Office Closures, Peer Counseling Services Face New Questions

News

Cambridge Education Association Endorses Six Challengers — And No Incumbents

News

Cambridge School Committee Allows Student Reps Non-Binding Vote

News

Harvard Athletics Removes Protections for Transgender Students From Handbook

Editorials

Here’s a Tip. Vote ‘No’ on Ballot Question 5.

By Emily N. Dial
By The Crimson Editorial Board
This staff editorial solely represents the majority view of The Crimson Editorial Board. It is the product of discussions at regular Editorial Board meetings. In order to ensure the impartiality of our journalism, Crimson editors who choose to opine and vote at these meetings are not involved in the reporting of articles on similar topics.

Massachusetts might increase the minimum wage for tipped workers over the next five years from $6.75 per hour to the statewide minimum wage — $15 dollars per hour — if voters approve Ballot Question 5 on Election Day.

Tellingly, many affected workers are far from enthusiastic about the proposal. In interviews with The Crimson, waiters and other tipped workers expressed concerns that the change would result in lower wages and fewer tips. Some even feared the measure would cost them their employment.

Their concerns are well placed: The average restaurant enjoys profit margins of less than five percent. Raising the minimum wage will only squeeze margins lower on account of higher labor costs. Who eats the difference? Unless tipping habits substantially change — which we believe is unlikely — restaurants will need to raise prices, depressing demand, until restaurants are forced to lay off staff.

In the two years following the passage of a similar measure in Washington, D.C., full-service restaurants lost 1,800 jobs, a startling indication of the measure’s effect.

When economics and common sense align, we should listen to those who know the industry best. Vote “no” on Ballot Question Five.

This staff editorial solely represents the majority view of The Crimson Editorial Board. It is the product of discussions at regular Editorial Board meetings. In order to ensure the impartiality of our journalism, Crimson editors who choose to opine and vote at these meetings are not involved in the reporting of articles on similar topics.

Have a suggestion, question, or concern for The Crimson Editorial Board? Click here.

Want to keep up with breaking news? Subscribe to our email newsletter.

Want to keep up with breaking news? Subscribe to our email newsletter.

Tags
Editorials