News

Shark Tank Star Kevin O’Leary Judges Six Harvard Startups at HBS Competition

News

The Return to Test Requirements Shrank Harvard’s Applicant Pool. Will It Change Harvard Classrooms?

News

HGSE Program Partners with States to Evaluate, Identify Effective Education Policies

News

Planning Group Releases Proposed Bylaws for a Faculty Senate at Harvard

News

How Cambridge’s Political Power Brokers Shape the 2025 Election

Notes

A Note to Readers on Faculty Survey Methodology

By Brian P. Yu and Phelan Yu, Crimson Staff Writers

To our readers:

We write to address a letter by Government Professor Dustin Tingely regarding the factual accuracy of faculty survey results reported in a May 1 Crimson article. We appreciate Prof. Tingely raising concerns that reporting the raw data without disclaiming a response bias leads to a perception that “all of the claims in the article could be flipped.”

The Crimson has updated the May 1 article to include a methodology section clarifying response validation and our understanding of the collected data. Broadly, respondent demographics tracked well with publicly available information on the demographics of the Faculty of Arts and Sciences.

Applying demographic re-weightings results in changes to the response category distributions by no greater than plus or minus 2.5 percent.

Brian P. Yu ’19
Associate News Editor, 145th Guard

Phelan Yu ’19
Associate News Editor, 145th Guard

Want to keep up with breaking news? Subscribe to our email newsletter.

Tags
Notes