News
Garber Privately Tells Faculty That Harvard Must Rethink Messaging After GOP Victory
News
Cambridge Assistant City Manager to Lead Harvard’s Campus Planning
News
Despite Defunding Threats, Harvard President Praises Former Student Tapped by Trump to Lead NIH
News
Person Found Dead in Allston Apartment After Hours-Long Barricade
News
‘I Am Really Sorry’: Khurana Apologizes for International Student Winter Housing Denials
To the editor:
A November 1 editorial in The Crimson urged students to vote in favor of Question 2, a ballot initiative which would allow the state of Massachusetts to approve 12 additional charter schools per year. While The Crimson rightly notes that “much more work is needed to make Massachusetts’ education system truly equitable,” Question 2 would devastate Massachusetts public schools, and citizens should vote it down next Tuesday.
As the editorial mentions, “opponents of Question 2 have focused mostly on their potential cost,” and it’s easy to see why. This year, charter schools will be granted more than $450 million in aid that would have gone to public schools, and estimates suggest that approving Question 2 could put public schools roughly $100 million further in the hole. That means less money for textbooks, teacher pay, and less support for special needs students. The editorial also mentions that additional charters would be placed in higher-need districts, but this would be a bug, not a feature: offering a small minority of students a better education while even further damaging underprivileged schools’ finances is not a solution.
Charter schools come with a litany of other concerns. For one, they are not accountable to voters through school board elections, a point left unaddressed by The Crimson’s editorial. The editorial board also ignores charter schools’ overreliance on disciplinary action: while charter schools comprise just 4 percent of Massachusetts public schools, they represent nearly 14 percent of schools with suspension and expulsion rates over 20 percent. Far from helping underprivileged students in Massachusetts, passage of Question 2 would strike a blow to public school funding and accountability, all while over-disciplining students. On November 8, vote no on Question 2.
Sincerely,
Henry S. Atkins
Henry S. Atkins ’20 serves as Question 2 Policy Captain for the Harvard College Democrats.
Want to keep up with breaking news? Subscribe to our email newsletter.