News
Garber Announces Advisory Committee for Harvard Law School Dean Search
News
First Harvard Prize Book in Kosovo Established by Harvard Alumni
News
Ryan Murdock ’25 Remembered as Dedicated Advocate and Caring Friend
News
Harvard Faculty Appeal Temporary Suspensions From Widener Library
News
Man Who Managed Clients for High-End Cambridge Brothel Network Pleads Guilty
After being dropped by Cornell (3-15, 1-5 Ivy) Friday night, the Crimson women’s volleyball team (10-7, 3-4) regrouped to handily defeat Columbia (11-6, 5-2) Saturday evening in straight sets.
“After losing to Cornell, we talked about it a lot and ... everyone on our team thought overnight about what we had to do to change,” co-captain libero Christine Wu said. “I think we just really showed up [against Columbia], and we had everyone’s presence on the court ... Everyone did their job.”
HARVARD 3, COLUMBIA 0
After taking a beating the night before against Cornell, Harvard proved to be a different team Saturday, dropping the Lions in three games, 25-23, 25-21, 25-23.
“Today everyone came ready to play and ready to fight as a team,” said co-captain middle blocker Sandra Lynne Fryhofer. “I think we had really good chemistry.”
The Crimson received contributions from all over the court against the Lions, which had entered the match in a tie for first place in the Ivy League.
Up front, freshman Kristen Casey logged 10 kills. Fryhofer added nine, and sophomore middle blocker Teresa Skelly and junior Taylor Docter claimed eight apiece.
“Our hitters did a really good job of finding open court and moving the ball around, and not just hitting to one side of the court,” Fryhofer said. “They saw the court really well.”
Strong serves also propelled the Crimson to victory, with Docter hitting five aces in the decision.
“We had some amazing serving [against Columbia],” Fryhofer said. “We were super aggressive serving on them, so they were kind of out of system, which was an advantage for us.”
The Crimson defense also had a solid performance on Saturday.
“We had some great blocking,” Fryhofer said. “Skelly and [sophomore] Erin Cooney ... were always up four hands every time.”
In all three sets, Harvard went back and forth with Columbia, winning by at most four points in a single set. But unlike in the previous night’s game, Harvard was able to sustain its winning momentum.
Columbia kept up with Harvard in the opening set, with the teams tying at 17-17, 19-19, and 21-21. But the Crimson pulled away when Doctor mustered up a powerful kill after a Harvard time-out—adding to her 200 total kills, 90 of which have been in Ivy play—deciding the match for Harvard, 25-23.
In the second set, Columbia and Harvard again began neck and neck, tying at 9-9 and again at 17-17, but the Crimson would jump out on a 7-0 run to best the Lions, 24-17. Columbia got a chance to come back after a Harvard missed-serve brought the score to 24-18, but the Crimson’s lead proved too great, and Harvard toppled the Lions, 25-21.
Docter began the third and final set of the night with an ace, setting the tone immediately. After an opening 4-0 run by Harvard, a disjointed Columbia team called a time-out. The Lions were able to regroup and give the Crimson a scare, tying things up at 16-all and 23-all. But the Crimson responded under pressure and sealed the deal with a 25-23 victory in the set.
CORNELL 3, HARVARD 1
Harvard started its weekend with a bang, crushing Cornell, 25-12, in the first set of the night on Friday. But as the night progressed, the squad’s initial fire fizzled. The Big Red took the next three sets on its way to a 3-1 victory over the Crimson for its first Ivy win of the season.
“We came out firing in the first game then we got complacent,” Wu said. “We kind of sat back and let them play at us.”
In the opening frame, the Crimson came out as a force, recording several match-highs. Docter logged a game-best five blocks and 14 kills, and Casey’s 17 digs and nine kills came just short of earning her a double-double. Fryhofer had a match-best eight blocks, and Cooney had six blocks and eight kills.
After taking the first set with ease, Harvard’s game dramatically declined as Cornell rose to the occasion.
“They played lights out,” Wu said. “They were just firing balls, and we didn’t really respond and didn’t stick with our strategy and play Harvard volleyball.”
The Crimson opened with a .215 hitting percentage, but it progressively dwindled to a mere .065 by the fourth and final set. While Harvard was on a decline, the Big Red was on the up and up, bettering its hitting percentage from .119 to .308, while taking the last three sets, 25-18, 25-17, 25-18, and holding Harvard to fewer than 20 points in each set.
“They just kind of broke us down,” Wu said. “It wasn’t our best performance.”
Want to keep up with breaking news? Subscribe to our email newsletter.