News
Garber Announces Advisory Committee for Harvard Law School Dean Search
News
First Harvard Prize Book in Kosovo Established by Harvard Alumni
News
Ryan Murdock ’25 Remembered as Dedicated Advocate and Caring Friend
News
Harvard Faculty Appeal Temporary Suspensions From Widener Library
News
Man Who Managed Clients for High-End Cambridge Brothel Network Pleads Guilty
The kindest things to say about John
Burnham Schwartz ’87’s new novel, “The
Commoner,” are the things that it isn’t.
It isn’t over-long, over-complicated, or
overwrought; it isn’t slow or boring; it
isn’t bad.
The trouble is, it isn’t particularly
good, either. And if not for its compelling
source material—the story of Empress
Michiko, the first commoner to marry
into the Japanese royal family—the
novel would be much worse. Despite its
vivid subject, Schwartz’s bland execution
produces a book that is curiously unremarkable,
even memorably forgettable.
“The Commoner” tells the story of
Empress Haruko, Schwartz’s fictionalized
vision of Empress Michiko. The basic
plot is one that’s been told over and
over in other forms: exceptional young
woman confronts the world, falters at
first, but eventually finds herself. In this
version, Haruko is a privileged but normal
girl growing up in Tokyo during
World War II. (As Schwartz writes with
characteristic limpness, “One might say
that my childhood insularity was a form
of hereditary protection in whose shade,
like a pale, delicate mushroom, I grew.”)
She excels at sports, and one fateful day
meets and beats the Crown Prince in a
game of tennis. The Prince falls in love
with her beautiful spirit, and so begins
the rest of her life.
Japan has the world’s oldest hereditary
monarchy, and Haruko’s life is
choked with thousands of years’ worth
of accrued ceremony: the 15 kilograms
of traditional clothing Haruko wears on
her wedding day, the seven-day naming
process for her first son. The monotony
and constriction of it push Haruko into
a nervous breakdown, forcing her to
leave the royal palace to convalesce at her
childhood home.
At this point, convention tells us, she
should recover from her mental anguish
and find the strength to carve out a place
for herself, even within the suffocating
environment of the court. Whether or
not Empress Michiko actually returned
from her convalescence with newfound
resolve, for the purposes of the novel
Haruko should at least have returned a
changed woman, whether empowered
or embittered or simply embarrassed.
But things seem to continue essentially
as they were before. When it
comes time for her son, the new Crown
Prince, to marry, Haruko convinces his
headstrong beloved to submit to the
stern hand of the monarchy. Together,
the novel suggests, these two women
will be able to withstand the pressures
of tradition that weighed so heavily
on Haruko alone. But when her new
daughter-in-law begins to stagger under
the burden—committing the faux pas
of entering rooms before her husband
and struggling with the formal court
language—Haruko abandons her: “She
was not the first to run into harsh limits;
I, of course, had been there before
her. But she was the first to innocently
believe—and who could blame her, having
received my solemn promise—that
she might somehow be protected from
the implacable forces set against her.”
The whole novel suffers from
Schwartz’s lack of engagement with the
central character. He doesn’t feel the
need to empathize with her. He plays
around with the facts of her life without
ever assembling them into a character.
His attitude can be embarrassingly reductive,
as when Haruko describes the
Emperor’s reaction to her breakdown:
“The hurt frustration he showed on realizing
his insufficiency—the wounded
perplexity of a deeply practical man
in the face of irregularities of a female
nature (that apparently sound mechanism
which nonetheless may decide, for
whatever reason, simply to cease functioning)—
could not contain itself.”
If all of Haruko’s problems, triumphs,
and struggles can be so easily
reduced to capricious feminine nature,
then why tell her story in the first place?
What’s interesting about a person who
submits meekly to biological weakness?
There is something undeniably compelling
about a person grappling with her
individual identity, but Schwartz misses
it in this novel. What you’ll remember is
not Haruko’s struggle, but how quickly
you forgot it.
—Staff writer Jillian J. Goodman can be
reached at jjgoodm@fas.harvard.edu.
Want to keep up with breaking news? Subscribe to our email newsletter.