News
Garber Announces Advisory Committee for Harvard Law School Dean Search
News
First Harvard Prize Book in Kosovo Established by Harvard Alumni
News
Ryan Murdock ’25 Remembered as Dedicated Advocate and Caring Friend
News
Harvard Faculty Appeal Temporary Suspensions From Widener Library
News
Man Who Managed Clients for High-End Cambridge Brothel Network Pleads Guilty
I walked out of the Loeb Ex on Friday feeling as though I had just been
through a war—a war that, like all wars, was chaotic and emotionally
draining. It took me the entire walk back to the Quad before my muscles
could relax.
Two and a half hours of watching a couple with issues can
really take it out of you. Under the direction of Daniel J. Wilner ’07,
the living-room drama of Edward Albee’s Tony award-winning “Who’s
Afraid of Virginia Woolf?” comes to an unsettlingly real life in the
Loeb Experimental Theatre April 27 through May 5. The show is produced
by Emily A. Cregg ’09.
Chelsey J. Forbess ’07 and Simon Nicholas ’07 play Martha and
George, a couple whose marriage has all but disintegrated. Martha
cannot stand George’s incompetence at the university where he teaches
history and where her father is the president, and George is almost as
sick of Martha’s Daddy-worship as he is of her hatred towards himself.
When a hotshot young professor of biology named Nick (Jack E.
Fishburn ’08) and his mousy wife Honey (Elyssa Jakim ’10) move into
town, Martha invites them over for some drinks. What begins as an
awkward gathering explodes into a game of deceit, violence, and
debauchery as Martha and George begin to unveil the dark secrets of
their marriage.
“Who’s Afraid of Virginia Woolf” made its debut in 1962, but
the script’s mix of the complex and the comprehensible fits it into any
stage at any time, provided there are capable people at the helm. The
Harvard Radcliffe Dramatic Club’s (HRDC) production of the play is
proof.
One of the best aspects of this outing is that the set,
designed by Todd Weekley, is constructed such that the audience shares
the same floor space as the actors. The audience sits on sofas and
chairs that line the four walls of Martha and George’s living room.
Most of the drama takes place at center stage, but the actors
often move to sit among the audience. It’s a design that could lead to
awkward discomfort, but in this production, it worked to perfection. If
ever I felt awkward, it was only because I, like Nick and Honey, felt
as though I were intruding upon the marital problems of my hosts.
And, boy, did the marital problems of my hosts feel real.
Nicholas, as George, visibly develops throughout the play from a
bitterly sarcastic, but still calm intellectual into a violent madman.
Forbess is alternately psychotic, malicious, and seductive.
Indisputably the star of a talented four-person cast, she is Martha:
from the sneer on her face to the garish bray of her laugh. The
couple’s repertoire vividly etches itself into one’s brain through the
screamed, snarled, spat—anything but spoken—dialogue.
Fishburn and Jakim also deserve accolades as supporting
actors. Fishburn was appropriately cocky and vapid and Jakim was
appropriately meek. Jakim’s nervous giggle especially intensified my
sense of being caught in the midst of a family feud.
However, the unrelenting tension of the production is both its greatest strength and weakness.
On the one hand, it showcases the actors’ commendable talents
in intensely complicated and poignant roles. But on the other, it has a
desensitizing effect. I was so numb by the third act that I couldn’t
even appreciate the final blow, which ought to be the most striking:
when George reveals Martha’s final secret. I wanted to be blown out of
my seat, but was too emotionally drained to respond beyond an “Oh.”
Overall, the tension of the play may be overkill. I kept on
looking for a dramatic peak, but never found it—not because of a lack
of drama, but because the drama is perpetually full-blast. I thought
that the play had climaxed when Nicholas attempted to strangle Forbess
in a grippingly violent scene. But a half hour later, and lo and
behold, there is another strangulation attempt. So, perhaps the blame
for the constant intensity lies with the script.
Nonetheless, the production manages to slip in the occasional
moment of humor. Forbess gets credit for providing the bulk of the
much-needed comic relief. Her crass voice alone—not to mention her
donkey’s laugh—made me giggle more than once. Nicholas’ sarcasm and
passive-aggressive humor also helped alleviate the production’s
intensity.
The tension in HRDC’s production of “Who’s Afraid of Virginia
Woolf?” didn’t add any lighthearted fun to my weekend. It was an
expertly-executed production whose actors so realistically conveyed
their depression that it made me think seriously about the state of the
institution of marriage.
—Reviewer April B. Wang can be reached at abwang@fas.harvard.edu.
Want to keep up with breaking news? Subscribe to our email newsletter.