News
Garber Announces Advisory Committee for Harvard Law School Dean Search
News
First Harvard Prize Book in Kosovo Established by Harvard Alumni
News
Ryan Murdock ’25 Remembered as Dedicated Advocate and Caring Friend
News
Harvard Faculty Appeal Temporary Suspensions From Widener Library
News
Man Who Managed Clients for High-End Cambridge Brothel Network Pleads Guilty
V for Vendetta
Directed by James McTeigue
Warner Brothers
The graphic novel, an intellectual nom-de-plume for the comic
book, has recently been a cash cow for Hollywood’s big-budget film
studios. Blockbusters like “Spiderman,” “X-Men,” and the “Fantastic
Four” have merged Hollywood’s A-list with the action-saturated
plotlines of childhood fiction.
“V for Vendetta” is a slight exception. The film substitutes
the latex-clad Jessica Alba type for an emaciated, bald-headed Natalie
Portman ’03 and a childlike plot for what attempts to be an eye opening
political satire.
“V for Vendetta,” based on the graphic novel by Alan Moore,
was adapted for the screen by the notorious Wachowski brothers of “The
Matrix” fame. The film is set in an Orwellian future, replete with
governmental conspiracies, constant surveillance, and a harsh crackdown
on political dissent. Portman compellingly plays Evey Hammond, the
film’s protagonist alongside “The Matrix”’s Hugo Weaving as the masked
liberator, V.
V and Evey collide by chance on the eve of Guy Fawkes Day (an
annual British celebration that few Americans are likely to have heard
of before watching the film) and are drawn together by a plan to save
England from the clutches of Sutler (John Hurt), a malevolent
Hilter-esque Chancellor. The film chronicles the struggles of Evey and
V over a full year against the countercurrent of Sutler and his minions
who are determined to quash their terrorist plot.
While the film is entertaining throughout with its visually
stunning action sequences, its political deftness and plot development
leave the viewer slightly nonplussed. Dialogue like, “Blowing up a
building can change the world,” is sloppy, and the verbose introduction
to the character of V is unnecessary.
Touching on an overabundance of social hot topics such as
homosexuality, religious tolerance and fanaticism, and political
dissidence, the film spreads itself too thin. The plot draws greatly
from “Phantom of the Opera”—including the masked protagonist—however,
the film’s love story between Evey and V feels rushed. Following her
torture at the hands of V, Evey ends up predictably, but not
convincingly, falling in love with her captor. Ironically,it is the
semi-poignant vignette of lesbian love that overshadows the romantic
bond between the film’s protagonists.
Despite sashaying between political drama and action film, “V”
has its moments of humor and subtlety. In one of the opening scenes, V
draws attention to the “paradox of asking a masked man who he is.” The
repeated use of the jazz standard, “Cry Me a River,” represented an
understated metaphor for political subversion that resonated throughout
the film as V struggles towards his goal of liberating the English
public.
The film’s greatest success is its staggeringly coherent
cinematography. Harlequin fireworks, dramatic iconography, and
overpowering mob images dominate the silver screen. From beginning to
end, the choreography of the explosive sequences succeeds with the same
grandeur of the accompanying Tchaikovsky score.
Bottom line: An entertaining movie for action lovers who
watched the entirety of “The Matrix Trilogy,” but perhaps not one for
the overly-critical philosophy or government concentrator.
—Staff writer Adam P. Schneider can be reached at aschneid@fas.harvard.edu.
Want to keep up with breaking news? Subscribe to our email newsletter.