News

Harvard Medical School Cancels Student Groups’ Pro-Palestine Vigil

News

Former FTC Chair Lina Khan Urges Democrats to Rethink Federal Agency Function at IOP Forum

News

Cyanobacteria Advisory Expected To Lift Before Head of the Charles Regatta

News

After QuOffice’s Closure, Its Staff Are No Longer Confidential Resources for Students Reporting Sexual Misconduct

News

Harvard Still On Track To Reach Fossil Fuel-Neutral Status by 2026, Sustainability Report Finds

Rejecting HBS Applicants Does Not Raise Ethical Standards

By Patrick S. Chung

To the editors:

Re: “HBS Rejects Snooping Hopefuls” (News, Mar. 8):

I wonder how many of the 119 applicants recently rejected by Harvard Business School (HBS) for hacking into the admissions website were actually to be admitted. If the number is significant (and I suspect it is, by HBS’s reluctance to disclose it), then it’s time for HBS to admit the obvious—that its process admits people that HBS Dean Kim B. Clark ’74 calls “unethical at best.”

The blanket rejection of the 119 applicants is HBS’s latest tokenistic attempt to “take a hard line” against a broader culture of ethical elasticity that HBS has played no small part in building. Despite its grandiose mission to “educate leaders that make a difference in the world,” it still churns out generation after generation of autonomic money-making machines. The lesson Clark teaches us this month is just to avoid getting caught.

PATRICK S. CHUNG ’96, HBS ’04

March 13, 2005

Want to keep up with breaking news? Subscribe to our email newsletter.

Tags