News
Garber Announces Advisory Committee for Harvard Law School Dean Search
News
First Harvard Prize Book in Kosovo Established by Harvard Alumni
News
Ryan Murdock ’25 Remembered as Dedicated Advocate and Caring Friend
News
Harvard Faculty Appeal Temporary Suspensions From Widener Library
News
Man Who Managed Clients for High-End Cambridge Brothel Network Pleads Guilty
Harvard researchers published a study last week concluding that
cooperation between colleges and communities reduces binge drinking and
drunk driving.
Three researchers at the Harvard School of Public Health
(HSPH) found that schools that fully implemented the “A Matter of
Degree” (AMOD) approach prevented drunk driving more effectively than
institutions that used traditional alcohol policies that focus on
educating individuals.
Many schools, including Harvard, currently use a social-norms
approach, which attempts to reduce binge drinking by changing students’
perceptions of their peers’ drinking habits. This approach is based on
the idea that students tend to think their peers drink more, and more
often, than they actually do.
But Henry Wechsler, principal investigator for the AMOD study
and an HSPH lecturer, said that his long-running College Alcohol Study,
which spawned AMOD, has not found any evidence that such programs are
effective by themselves. Instead, Wechsler’s study showed that a
combination of policies that limit access to and consumption of alcohol
better curb binge drinking and drunk driving on campuses.
The policies used in AMOD include: training for bartenders to
help them better identify patrons who have drunken too much and
identify fake driver’s licenses, requiring registration for keg
purchasers, upholding stringent drinking-age laws, banning
alcohol-related items from student bookstores, and expanding
substance-free dorms.
From 1997 to 2001, students at the ten AMOD schools reported
driving less frequently after drinking any alcohol, or having five or
more drinks, than their counterparts at other colleges, Wechsler and
his colleagues wrote in the December issue of Traffic Injury
Prevention.
“The results support and confirm our contention that a
comprehensive environmental program is really what will benefit
colleges, the communities around them, and the young people within
them,” said Elissa R. Weitzman, the co-principal investigator and
director of the AMOD evaluation.
The HSPH researchers said the AMOD program differs significantly from other policies aimed at reducing drunk driving.
“The AMOD approach...does not simply attempt to change students’ perceptions of what others are doing,” Wechsler said.
Rather, he said, AMOD uses several policies in tandem to decrease both the demand for and supply of alcohol.
“We didn’t find any single policies that worked the best,”
Wechsler said. “We found that having a number of policies that
concentrate on this problem was the way to go.”
The study’s authors said they were aware of concerns that
policies discouraging drinking on campus might cause drinkers to move
farther away—and thus drink and drive more often.
“We actually found the opposite of that,” lead author Toben F. Nelson said.
Participants in the study were Florida State University,
Georgia Tech, Lehigh University, Louisiana State University, University
of Colorado, University of Delaware, University of Iowa, University of
Nebraska at Lincoln, University of Vermont, and University of
Wisconsin.
Director of Harvard Alcohol and Substance Abuse Services Ryan M. Travia did not return repeated requests for comment.
The AMOD program is funded through 2008 by the Robert Wood
Johnson Foundation. According to Nelson, HSPH researchers will continue
evaluating the approach in the coming years.
Want to keep up with breaking news? Subscribe to our email newsletter.