News

Community Safety Department Director To Resign Amid Tension With Cambridge Police Department

News

From Lab to Startup: Harvard’s Office of Technology Development Paves the Way for Research Commercialization

News

People’s Forum on Graduation Readiness Held After Vote to Eliminate MCAS

News

FAS Closes Barker Center Cafe, Citing Financial Strain

News

8 Takeaways From Harvard’s Task Force Reports

Voting Company Should Not Hide Behind Law

Letter to the Editors

By Peter G. Neumann

To the editors:

After reading The Crimson’s Nov. 10 article, “Student Accused of Violating Copyrights,” my heart goes out to Derek A. Slater ’05. As someone who has for many years been attempting to induce the electronic voting machine vendors to provide a reasonable amount of integrity and accountability in their voting systems, I am horrified at Diebold Election Systems’ attempt to use the Digital Millennium Copyright Act to further their regressive practice of hiding behind copyrights in an industry whose products are fundamentally flawed by an almost complete absence of meaningful assurance that votes are entered and counted correctly—and whose proprietary software is intended to be protected from effective scrutiny. In these systems, there are no audit trails and no real evidence that something might have gone wrong or been maliciously defrauded. Integrity and democracy must be protected, not questionable practices.

Peter G. Neumann ’54
Nov. 10, 2003

Want to keep up with breaking news? Subscribe to our email newsletter.

Tags