News

Harvard Medical School Cancels Student Groups’ Pro-Palestine Vigil

News

Former FTC Chair Lina Khan Urges Democrats to Rethink Federal Agency Function at IOP Forum

News

Cyanobacteria Advisory Expected To Lift Before Head of the Charles Regatta

News

After QuOffice’s Closure, Its Staff Are No Longer Confidential Resources for Students Reporting Sexual Misconduct

News

Harvard Still On Track To Reach Fossil Fuel-Neutral Status by 2026, Sustainability Report Finds

Core Does Not Need Replacement, Just Fixing

Letter to the Editors

By David L. Richmond

To the editors:

Travis R. Kavulla ’06 writes in The Crimson of Sept. 30 that the Core is badly dumbed down and fails to serve its stated intent to teach “approaches” to knowledge (Column, "The Hollowed Core"). But Kavulla ignores successful aspects of the Core in his zeal to discredit it.

The Core, whatever its identifiable problems, is not in need of an overhaul so much as a tweak. And it is certainly not in need of an overhaul along the lines of Kavulla’s suggestions. Am I indeed a more liberally educated person if I take Philosophy 168 instead of Michael Sandel’s “Justice”? Or do I know a lot about Kant while having missed out on Aristotle, Locke, Mill and Rawls?

Declaring that Harvard students ought to be taught a certain body of knowledge is very nice thing to say, but determining what is valuable enough to be included in that body of knowledge is inherently contentious. Better to let Harvard professors propose their own valuations, in the form of a course description in the catalog and a syllabus during shopping period, and let the Harvard student decide.

David L. Richmond ’06

Sept. 30, 2003

Want to keep up with breaking news? Subscribe to our email newsletter.

Tags