News
Garber Announces Advisory Committee for Harvard Law School Dean Search
News
First Harvard Prize Book in Kosovo Established by Harvard Alumni
News
Ryan Murdock ’25 Remembered as Dedicated Advocate and Caring Friend
News
Harvard Faculty Appeal Temporary Suspensions From Widener Library
News
Man Who Managed Clients for High-End Cambridge Brothel Network Pleads Guilty
After nearly two months of hype, turmoil and conflict, Suzy Wetlaufer ’81 suddenly resigned her position with the Harvard Business Review (HBR) yesterday, more than a month after she admitted having an affair with an interview subject she was profiling.
“Harvard Business Review will never again be a place where I will be able to work to my full potential,” Wetlaufer said in an e-mail to the Review’s editorial staff yesterday announcing her resignation.
After the scandal made national headlines earlier this spring, Wetlaufer gave up her post as editor of HBR and became an editor-at-large for the magazine.
But as of yesterday, she left the magazine for good.
“We wish Suzy well in her future endeavors,” said Walter Kiechel ’68, editorial director of the Harvard Business School Publishing (HBSP), in a statement yesterday.
Wetlaufer first came under fire earlier this year after conducting an interview with former General Electric CEO Jack Welch.
Her interaction with Welch had developed into an affair, which she had concealed until she was confronted by Welch’s wife.
Wetlaufer then acknowledged the affair might have compromised her objectivity in writing the article and called the article’s integrity into question.
“Suzy did what she felt was the right thing to do under the circumstances,” said Karen Schwartzman, Wetlaufer’s spokesperson.
“When she found a conflict had arisen, she requested the piece be pulled,” Schwartzman said. “She did what she thought she should do.”
According to Schwartzman, Wetlaufer and HBR reached an “amicable agreement” that she cut all ties with the magazine.
While Schwartzman would not comment on the specific terms of the settlement, she told the Associated Press that the package included a financial settlement.
Though Wetlaufer had initially resigned as editor and assumed the editor-at-large position as a compromise that would keep her at HBR, her spokesperson said Wetlaufer “regretted the actions she took were not sufficient to maintain the trust of her colleagues.”
After word of the affair circulated, four HBR editors wrote letters to Kiechel asking for Wetlaufer’s resignation.
At the meeting where Wetlaufer was demoted, two of the editors walked out, saying they thought she should quit outright—and then, in protest, Harris Collingwood ’77 and Alden Hayashi resigned their HBR posts.
In an interview yesterday, Kiechel said the two were unlikely to return even now that Wetlaufer had left the magazine.
“We’ve talked to them before this. They said their resignations are irrevocable,” he said. “I don’t know if they want to talk to us anymore.”
In reaction to turmoil at the Business Review, HBSP decided to form a task force to review ethics problems and conflicts of interest within the publishing branch. The code of ethics is currently in draft form.
“The code of ethics is something we needed to bring up to date anyway and it’s not necessarily affected by her situation,” Kiechel said.
Another of the HBR executive editors, Nicholas Carr, who earlier wrote a letter demanding Wetlaufer’s resignation said yesterday that he had read her statement and that he took it “at face value.”
“Everyone here has complete faith in the integrity of the publication,” said Carr, who is acting as one of HBR’s interim editors.
Want to keep up with breaking news? Subscribe to our email newsletter.