News

Harvard Quietly Resolves Anti-Palestinian Discrimination Complaint With Ed. Department

News

Following Dining Hall Crowds, Harvard College Won’t Say Whether It Tracked Wintersession Move-Ins

News

Harvard Outsources Program to Identify Descendants of Those Enslaved by University Affiliates, Lays Off Internal Staff

News

Harvard Medical School Cancels Class Session With Gazan Patients, Calling It One-Sided

News

Garber Privately Tells Faculty That Harvard Must Rethink Messaging After GOP Victory

Letters

Crimson Mistakes Role Of Ombudsperson

Letter to the Editors

By Frank E.A. Sander

To the editors:

Your editorial on the newly appointed ombudsman (“Ombuds and Upwards,” Oct. 24) regrettably uses interchangeably the terms “ombudsperson,” “mediator,” and “arbitrator.” While there are some differences between the first two terms—a mediator, unlike an ombudsman, normally does not investigate, he primarily facilitates communication between the parties—there is a critical difference between these two and an arbitrator. An arbitrator is a private judge who renders a binding decision, which would be inappropriate for an ombudsman, as your editorial appears to recognize.

Frank E.A. Sander

Oct. 25, 2002

The writer is Bussey professor of law and an associate dean at Harvard Law School. He is a representative on the Ombuds Council.

Want to keep up with breaking news? Subscribe to our email newsletter.

Tags
Letters