News

Harvard Medical School Cancels Student Groups’ Pro-Palestine Vigil

News

Former FTC Chair Lina Khan Urges Democrats to Rethink Federal Agency Function at IOP Forum

News

Cyanobacteria Advisory Expected To Lift Before Head of the Charles Regatta

News

After QuOffice’s Closure, Its Staff Are No Longer Confidential Resources for Students Reporting Sexual Misconduct

News

Harvard Still On Track To Reach Fossil Fuel-Neutral Status by 2026, Sustainability Report Finds

Letters

Crimson Mistakes Role Of Ombudsperson

Letter to the Editors

By Frank E.A. Sander

To the editors:

Your editorial on the newly appointed ombudsman (“Ombuds and Upwards,” Oct. 24) regrettably uses interchangeably the terms “ombudsperson,” “mediator,” and “arbitrator.” While there are some differences between the first two terms—a mediator, unlike an ombudsman, normally does not investigate, he primarily facilitates communication between the parties—there is a critical difference between these two and an arbitrator. An arbitrator is a private judge who renders a binding decision, which would be inappropriate for an ombudsman, as your editorial appears to recognize.

Frank E.A. Sander

Oct. 25, 2002

The writer is Bussey professor of law and an associate dean at Harvard Law School. He is a representative on the Ombuds Council.

Want to keep up with breaking news? Subscribe to our email newsletter.

Tags
Letters