Please, Sir, I Want Some More

Last week, "Eating Disorder Awareness Week" was announced under the heading of "Wellness Matters" on the weekly three-sided table tent printed by Harvard University Dining Services (HUDS). However, judging from the comments of Dining Services Director Ted A. Mayer at a recent Undergraduate Council meeting, HUDS seems to be adopting a policy with which weight-watchers University-wide can live.

At a Feb. 25 council meeting, Mayer was invited to discuss student preferences at dining halls.

At one point Holworthy representative Lauren E. Bonner '04 suggested including the lunchtime sandwich bar at dinner as well. Mayer mentioned that they tried such a move a few years ago and deferred the proposition to Executive Chef Michael Miller.

Miller then said that the dinner bar became a problem because students on the go would prepare sandwiches and take them out. To this, Bonner said what any other good representative would say: "I don't understand why that's a problem."

Mayer and Miller then agreed that such a convenience led to (gasp) people taking more food, thus costing Dining Services more money. Let's recap: Dining Services cited students taking more food as a reason not to incorporate a sandwich bar at dinner.

Folks, don't be surprised if you get your hand slapped by the sweet lady behind the counter the next time you go for seconds of General Wong's chicken.

Perhaps Mayer should adjust the HUDS slogan from "Dedicated to the liberal art of eating" to "Dedicated to the prevention of liberal eating."

Bonner was no less dumbfounded, when she admitted, "I'm sort of confused--I feel like the purpose of Dining Services is to feed people." Touche. I smell re-election.

Bonner even described how a dinner sandwich bar would reduce the amount of hot dishes needed and thus mitigate against any extra cost. Without the sandwich bar, diners will either try a questionable meal that will probably end up in the dish room or opt for dependable but not-as-wholesome cereal. Twice a week, I, myself, find the need to get my hands on some Lucky Charms.

There is a common belief around the University that the council is a powerless body. However, after this discussion last Sunday evening, I share the frustration of council members whose suggestions are faced with such a restrictive policy.

Even though Mayer said that he is now considering the proposal as a once-a-week feature, this incident sets a precedent. When will other requests be honored if HUDS is not only against change but against the will of those they are "dedicated" to serving?

I find the whole process tougher to chew than Annenberg beef.

--Justin D. Gest