News
Garber Announces Advisory Committee for Harvard Law School Dean Search
News
First Harvard Prize Book in Kosovo Established by Harvard Alumni
News
Ryan Murdock ’25 Remembered as Dedicated Advocate and Caring Friend
News
Harvard Faculty Appeal Temporary Suspensions From Widener Library
News
Man Who Managed Clients for High-End Cambridge Brothel Network Pleads Guilty
An article co-authored by Harvard lecturer Andrew J. Berry in the journal Nature seeks to refute the argument that rape is a product of evolution.
Berry and his co-author, Jerry A. Coyne, attack the research behind the controversial book A Natural History of Rape, which suggests that the forces of natural selection promoted rape.
While some feminists have long fought to place full blame for rape on the rapist's choices, Natural History of Rape implies that this may not be the case because human genes could have evolved to favor the behavior.
But Berry and Coyne said that people are getting worked up about a theory that is not true.
"This is not an especially worthwhile debate," Berry said. "The book elicited a lot of excitement among feminists, and, in the process, the science has been overlooked."
Berry called Natural History's use of scientific evidence "a simple minded extraction" and criticized the authors for presenting misleading and illogical evidence.
In their book, Natural History authors Randy Thornhill and Craig T. Palmer claim that rape may be an adaptation that allows males who would have been unable to find willing sexual partners to reproduce. They argue that the fact that most rape victims are in their reproductive prime suggests that rape is aimed at reproduction.
But Berry and Coyne argue that the authors' use of statistics is misleading.
"They've twisted the data to make it look as though it supports the argument whereas it frankly does not," Berry said.
He said the very study Thornhill and Palmer cite states that 29 percent of US rape victims are under age 11.
In attacking Thornhill and Palmer's argument, Berry says that he and Coyne are "just doing a watchdog job."
"Bad science should die the death of bad science," he said. "My hope is that having put them in their place, everyone will put [the debate] away and will go home," Berry said.
But he doubts that the issue will disappear.
"My fear is that this isn't going to be the last of it. It seems to be a general phenomenon," he said.
He said he was troubled by the increase in deterministic theories, such as the recent studies suggesting the existence of genes for thrill-seeking and homosexuality, among other behaviors.
"It is unfortunate that there is so much enthusiasm for poor science," Berry said.
Neither of the books author's were available for comment yesterday afternoon.
Want to keep up with breaking news? Subscribe to our email newsletter.