News
Penny Pritzker Says She Has ‘Absolutely No Idea’ How Trump Talks Will Conclude
News
Harvard Researchers Find Executive Function Tests May Be Culturally Biased
News
Researchers Release Report on People Enslaved by Harvard-Affiliated Vassall Family
News
Zusy Seeks First Full Term for Cambridge City Council
News
NYT Journalist Maggie Haberman Weighs In on Trump’s White House, Democratic Strategy at Harvard Talk
To the editors:
I have only recently come across the June 1 dissent from the Crimson staff editorial on gay rights. The writers argue that the pro-gay argument is intolerant to religion.
I don't want to argue with the writers on the merits of the issue, just to ponder at their use of Marx's saying that democracy provides freedom of religion, not freedom from religion. The writers use this saying to support their argument. But Marx said that as a critique of the human rights idea, as manifested in the French Declaration of the Rights of Man.
Marx was concerned that the human rights idea did not provide "man" with "real" freedom: it provided freedom of religion, but not freedom from religion, which Marx thought desirable. It provided freedom of property, not the freedom from property, which Marx wanted.
In Marx's view, this human rights idea only protected the rights of egoistic man, not of man as "species-being." So Marx's saying was a critique, not a happy description. To invoke it so out of context is absurd. AEYAL GROSS Aug 13, 1998
The writer is on the law faculty of Tel-Aviv University.
Want to keep up with breaking news? Subscribe to our email newsletter.