News
Penny Pritzker Says She Has ‘Absolutely No Idea’ How Trump Talks Will Conclude
News
Harvard Researchers Find Executive Function Tests May Be Culturally Biased
News
Researchers Release Report on People Enslaved by Harvard-Affiliated Vassall Family
News
Zusy Seeks First Full Term for Cambridge City Council
News
NYT Journalist Maggie Haberman Weighs In on Trump’s White House, Democratic Strategy at Harvard Talk
The staff is cowardly in refusing to take a stand against honoring a murderer.
In several well-researched paragraphs, the violations of the Chinese government are laid out, which in themselves might be persuasive enough to convince the staff not to welcome Jiang Zemin. Interestingly, the staff does not mention his role in ordering the tanks into Tiananmen Square eight years ago, causing the death of students just like us, who were martyred in the name of free speech.
The staff's justification--that he holds power over millions--sounds more like the appeasement of a terrorist than a defense of free speech.
That we would offer a forum to a murderer is in itself despicable, but that as a free press we would offer the right to speak without fear of persecution to a man who will not do the same is illogical.
While a hostile attitude toward China on the part of our government could conceivably exacerbate human rights abuses in that country, we doubt the University would have the same effect. If the U.S. wants to listen to Jiang Zemin, let it do so on public land, not on the grounds of a hallowed University that stands for freedom, reason and truth--things Jiang Zemin has not protected.
On a Mass. Ave. gate entering the Yard reads the admonition, "Enter to grow in wisdom. Depart to serve better thy country and thy kind."
It is doubtful Jiang Zemin will do either.
Want to keep up with breaking news? Subscribe to our email newsletter.