News

Harvard Medical School Cancels Student Groups’ Pro-Palestine Vigil

News

Former FTC Chair Lina Khan Urges Democrats to Rethink Federal Agency Function at IOP Forum

News

Cyanobacteria Advisory Expected To Lift Before Head of the Charles Regatta

News

After QuOffice’s Closure, Its Staff Are No Longer Confidential Resources for Students Reporting Sexual Misconduct

News

Harvard Still On Track To Reach Fossil Fuel-Neutral Status by 2026, Sustainability Report Finds

Limit Is Too Low

DISSENT

By Peter F. Wallace

While the staff clearly understands the economic theory of co-payments, they fail to heed their own wisdom in this editorial. As expounded upon above, co-payments serve to foster greater responsibility for medical decisions by forcing individuals to consider the costs of their health care.

I share the staff's concern for the finances of the University's employees, agreeing that families should be protected against the financial hardship imposed by serious illness or accident; however, the proposed limit on copayments is unrealistically low. Union members should be insured against major catastrophes, but a $100 cap on co-payments will encourage abuse of health services--prompting individuals to opt for unnecessary medical attention without regard to the costs.

Want to keep up with breaking news? Subscribe to our email newsletter.

Tags