News

Harvard Medical School Cancels Student Groups’ Pro-Palestine Vigil

News

Former FTC Chair Lina Khan Urges Democrats to Rethink Federal Agency Function at IOP Forum

News

Cyanobacteria Advisory Expected To Lift Before Head of the Charles Regatta

News

After QuOffice’s Closure, Its Staff Are No Longer Confidential Resources for Students Reporting Sexual Misconduct

News

Harvard Still On Track To Reach Fossil Fuel-Neutral Status by 2026, Sustainability Report Finds

No Punitive Sanctions

DISSENT

By Joshua A. Kaufman

The staff's knee-jerk reaction to the uncovering of severe racism at Texaco wrongly calls for the University to divest should Harvard not be able to clear the oil company of its tarnished name. In so doing, a mistaken question is posed: The issue is not whether Texaco's executives have institutionalized racism there (they have), but how Harvard can most effectively combat that racism.

Texaco is a public corporation in which Harvard is a stockholder. That equity gives the University a say in who manages the company and in how it is managed. Harvard should exercise its authority constructively within corporate America rather than simply and naively respond with punitive sanctions that ultimately benefit no one.

Want to keep up with breaking news? Subscribe to our email newsletter.

Tags