News

Harvard Medical School Cancels Student Groups’ Pro-Palestine Vigil

News

Former FTC Chair Lina Khan Urges Democrats to Rethink Federal Agency Function at IOP Forum

News

Cyanobacteria Advisory Expected To Lift Before Head of the Charles Regatta

News

After QuOffice’s Closure, Its Staff Are No Longer Confidential Resources for Students Reporting Sexual Misconduct

News

Harvard Still On Track To Reach Fossil Fuel-Neutral Status by 2026, Sustainability Report Finds

Still No Competition

DISSENT

By Jonathan A. Lewin

The original goal of the Coop was to provide students with the books and supplies they needed at the lowest possible price. But the Coop itself has demonstrated over the past decade that a monopoly is no longer the way to save students money.

For the last century, Harvard has provided the Coop with a list of all the books required for its classes. The Harvard Bookstore, Wordsworth and Barillaris have all had to fight for market share despite the disadvantage of not being given the exclusive catalog of sure-sellers. Barillaris folded as a result, and the Harvard Bookstore may be on the way.

If Harvard simply provided the Square's stores with class reading lists, all bookstores would be forced to lower prices by at least 10 percent in order to compete.

Bringing in Barnes and Noble to manage the Coop is just a stop-gap measure. The Coop has already dramatically demonstrated that, when possible, the market should not be interfered with. The orginal concept of the Coop--that the students should be given a rebate--has been compromised. The Coop is no longer a cooperative. It should become just another competitor in the Square.

Want to keep up with breaking news? Subscribe to our email newsletter.

Tags