None of the Above

The staff's lame endorsement of Rudd W. Coffey '97 is based on this premise: He's only a sophomore, so the campus hasn't discovered what a slime he is yet.

There's no good reason to vote for any of these retreads. Liston is incompetent, Fine corrupt and Coffey once called Liston his "big brother" in public. They suck. As long as council members--and not the student body--vote for president, we'll get nothing but Michael W. Beys '94 and Joshua D. Liston' 95 clones.

The only responsible endorsement in this race is none of the above. The Undergraduate Council would be better off without a president than any of these three clowns.