News

Harvard Quietly Resolves Anti-Palestinian Discrimination Complaint With Ed. Department

News

Following Dining Hall Crowds, Harvard College Won’t Say Whether It Tracked Wintersession Move-Ins

News

Harvard Outsources Program to Identify Descendants of Those Enslaved by University Affiliates, Lays Off Internal Staff

News

Harvard Medical School Cancels Class Session With Gazan Patients, Calling It One-Sided

News

Garber Privately Tells Faculty That Harvard Must Rethink Messaging After GOP Victory

Randomization is Best

DISSENT

By Sarah J. Schaffer

Can a house have too much diversity? The staff seems to thinks so. By again defending non-ordered choice-- whether with four or six choices--the staff continues to inhibit true diversity. Homogeneous populations don't add character to a house. Instead, demographic biases in the houses deprive students of an important part of their education: learning to live with all kinds of people.

Randomization need not separate friends; a block of 20 or 16 could easily accomodate most groups seeking to stay together. But why allow similar groups such a high probability of living in the same house? The most enriching kind of interpersonal interaction starts the way it did for first-years, with complete randomization.

Want to keep up with breaking news? Subscribe to our email newsletter.

Tags