News

Harvard Medical School Cancels Student Groups’ Pro-Palestine Vigil

News

Former FTC Chair Lina Khan Urges Democrats to Rethink Federal Agency Function at IOP Forum

News

Cyanobacteria Advisory Expected To Lift Before Head of the Charles Regatta

News

After QuOffice’s Closure, Its Staff Are No Longer Confidential Resources for Students Reporting Sexual Misconduct

News

Harvard Still On Track To Reach Fossil Fuel-Neutral Status by 2026, Sustainability Report Finds

Randomization is Best

DISSENT

By Sarah J. Schaffer

Can a house have too much diversity? The staff seems to thinks so. By again defending non-ordered choice-- whether with four or six choices--the staff continues to inhibit true diversity. Homogeneous populations don't add character to a house. Instead, demographic biases in the houses deprive students of an important part of their education: learning to live with all kinds of people.

Randomization need not separate friends; a block of 20 or 16 could easily accomodate most groups seeking to stay together. But why allow similar groups such a high probability of living in the same house? The most enriching kind of interpersonal interaction starts the way it did for first-years, with complete randomization.

Want to keep up with breaking news? Subscribe to our email newsletter.

Tags