News

Harvard Medical School Cancels Student Groups’ Pro-Palestine Vigil

News

Former FTC Chair Lina Khan Urges Democrats to Rethink Federal Agency Function at IOP Forum

News

Cyanobacteria Advisory Expected To Lift Before Head of the Charles Regatta

News

After QuOffice’s Closure, Its Staff Are No Longer Confidential Resources for Students Reporting Sexual Misconduct

News

Harvard Still On Track To Reach Fossil Fuel-Neutral Status by 2026, Sustainability Report Finds

Dershowitz Ignores Legal Precedent

TO THE EDITORS

NO WRITER ATTRIBUTED

In a recent article on proposed harassment rules for the Law School ("Law Students Criticize Policy on Hate Speech," March 22, 1994), Frankfurter Professor of Law Alan M. Dershowitz stated that Harvard should not worry about the law when drafting delicate hate speech rules.

Prof. Dershowitz's statement, "We don't have to follow the courts," tends to reinforce the notion that private educational institutions are not subject to Constitutional restraints.

But, especially in Massachusetts, it's just not that simple. In a landmark 1986 case, Abramowitz v. Boston University, a Superior Court judge ruled that the state's broad civil rights law forces private universities to respect students' First Amendment rights. While no appellate court has ruled on this particular question, judges have applied the law to other private entities.

I also wonder why, as a civil libertarian, Prof. Dershowitz would so eagerly dismiss the courts as an aggrieved student's last line of defense against powerful university administrators. Joshua A. Gerstein '91   The writer, a television news producer in Washington, D.C., is a former Senior Editor of The Crimson.

Want to keep up with breaking news? Subscribe to our email newsletter.

Tags