News
After Court Restores Research Funding, Trump Still Has Paths to Target Harvard
News
‘Honestly, I’m Fine with It’: Eliot Residents Settle In to the Inn as Renovations Begin
News
He Represented Paul Toner. Now, He’s the Fundraising Frontrunner in Cambridge’s Municipal Elections.
News
Harvard College Laundry Prices Increase by 25 Cents
News
DOJ Sues Boston and Mayor Michelle Wu ’07 Over Sanctuary City Policy
We were distributed to see, in a recent Crimson article about Quincy House, a reference to our suite as the "18-Person."
Our suite in the "18-Man."
Although we are, in fact, persons, we prefer the more specific, although admittedly genderbissed, "men." Your use of the word "person" is an unconscionable act of verbal castration which has left us bereft of our linguistic phallus.
However, the central issue is one of categorization. "Men" is simply the most specific rubric under which we all fit.
Were we all Jewish, would you refer to us as the "18-Theisi" Of course not. You would refer to us as the "18-Jew." Similarly, if we were all hyper-sensitive journalists of limited ability, we would be known as the "18-Crimson Reporter."
Furthermore, this imbroglio underscores a more central issue. We are as concerned as you are about the inherent prejudices of language. But as Wittgenstein noted, all words impose arbitrary categorical limitations on the nominal world.
Therefore, if in the future, you want to avoid the exclusionism, bias and hatred inherent is language, just stop writing. David Javerbounr '93 Jason Vincx '93
Want to keep up with breaking news? Subscribe to our email newsletter.