News
Garber Announces Advisory Committee for Harvard Law School Dean Search
News
First Harvard Prize Book in Kosovo Established by Harvard Alumni
News
Ryan Murdock ’25 Remembered as Dedicated Advocate and Caring Friend
News
Harvard Faculty Appeal Temporary Suspensions From Widener Library
News
Man Who Managed Clients for High-End Cambridge Brothel Network Pleads Guilty
As an $850 million budget deficit threatens to unbalance the state's account books, education officials and legislators say they fear that the Weld administration's cost-cutting measures could drastically bite into public scholarship funding for private universities such as Harvard.
The threat is especially ominous to the dozens of private colleges and universities in the state, since they shouldered a funding cut earlier this academic year. This fall, Massachusetts slashed $7 million from the $68 million it had previously agreed to give to the private schools.
And although it is impossible to predict the final outcome of fiscal wranglings in the state house, officials at private universities say they are worried about any potential loss of state-funded scholarships.
"When times get this tough fiscally, you have to be really worried," says Kevin Casey, director of state relations at Harvard. "[You] don't know what to expect, what you'll be getting from the state."
Harvard's state funding for undergraduates has fallen from about $600,000 last year to little more than $300,000 this year, according to Jim Miller, director of the Undergraduate Financial Aid Office. The entire financial aid budget is about $27 million.
But although Miller concedes that "in the overall scheme of things $300,000 is not that huge," he says that the money "is a lot to cut out of a very tight budget." He points out that the financial aid budget will come under even greater strain as Harvard College tightens its own belt.
Even if the state does decide to cut back on its scholarship money at this late date in the academic year, undergraduate financial aid will not be cut, Casey says. "We have made a commitment to make up lost Massachusetts funds with institutional funds."
Scholarships Easy to Cut
Many senators and representatives on Beacon Hill see the scholarships for private colleges as the easiest item to cut, Casey says, adding that the legislators are working under pressure in order to reduce the deficit by June 30--the end of the fiscal year.
Recently, Weld has hinted at moving away from providing direct grants to Massachusetts students in favor of a loan-based financial-aid program, Casey says.
And if the bill to abolish public-funded scholarships does go through, its most likely effect at Harvard would be to raise tuition, he says.
The cuts will likely impact other Massachusetts schools more seriously than Harvard, since Harvard can insulate the blow through its extensive fundraising ability and its $5 billion endowment.
"We're probably not as affected as some of the other private colleges because our alums have been very generous," Miller says.
Private Schools Cheaper
The decision to cut funding may depend on convincing legislators that public scholarships for private institutions are justified, Casey says, explaining that many members of the State House deny that the scholarships are a top priority, since students have the option of attending public universities if they cannot afford the more expensive tuition costs of private institutions.
But Casey argues that it is actually cheaper in the long run for Massachusetts to provide scholarships to private schools than to pay for students to attend public universities since the state must eventually pay for all of the costs associated with public education, instead of just paying for students' tuition at private schools.
Education Lobbyists
If Massachusetts private schools are to keep their endangered scholarship money, they will have to rely heavily on the efforts of lobbying groups such as the Association of Independent Colleges and Universities of Massachusetts (AICUM), an umbrella group of most of the private colleges and universities in the state.
"We oppose cutting scholarships because it hurts students," says Clare Cotton, president of AICUM. "They [scholarships] are the most effective investment a taxpayer can make."
And legislators on Beacon Hill, caught between education lobbyists and a constricting economy, remain ambiguous in their support of public funding for private colleges and universities.
"[I] will try to do everything that I can--it all depends on funding," says state representative Al Thompson (D-Cambridge). "I would support it to a point."
Want to keep up with breaking news? Subscribe to our email newsletter.