News

After Court Restores Research Funding, Trump Still Has Paths to Target Harvard

News

‘Honestly, I’m Fine with It’: Eliot Residents Settle In to the Inn as Renovations Begin

News

He Represented Paul Toner. Now, He’s the Fundraising Frontrunner in Cambridge’s Municipal Elections.

News

Harvard College Laundry Prices Increase by 25 Cents

News

DOJ Sues Boston and Mayor Michelle Wu ’07 Over Sanctuary City Policy

BUTTING HEADS

NO WRITER ATTRIBUTED

Proposition 1-2-3, a binding referendum that will appear on city ballots in next November's election, has proved one of the most divisive issues in Cambridge politics this year.

Supporters of the measure claim it will allow thousands of city residents to buy their own homes, while opponents claim the measure could devastate the city's 19-year old rent-control ordinance.

The referendum is divided into three parts:

Proposition 1 would allow tenants who have lived in rent-controlled apartments for more than two years to buy them, if the landlord is willing to sell.

Proposition 2 would exempt from rent control single-family homes and condominiums which have been lived in by their owners for more than two years.

Proposition 3 would set aside two-thirds of the tax revenues raised by the sale of rent-controlled apartments and place it in a special fund to support affordable housing.

As part of an ongoing Commentary feature, The Crimson solicited editorial pieces from city residents supporting and opposing 1-2-3.

Want to keep up with breaking news? Subscribe to our email newsletter.

Tags