News
Community Safety Department Director To Resign Amid Tension With Cambridge Police Department
News
From Lab to Startup: Harvard’s Office of Technology Development Paves the Way for Research Commercialization
News
People’s Forum on Graduation Readiness Held After Vote to Eliminate MCAS
News
FAS Closes Barker Center Cafe, Citing Financial Strain
News
8 Takeaways From Harvard’s Task Force Reports
An article on page three of yesterday's Crimson incorrectly described realtor Fred Meyer's initiative petition, Proposition 1-2-3.
The petition, which supporters want to place on the 1989 municipal ballot, would not use a "means test" to let only low-income tenants live in rent-controlled housing. Such a law would be illegal.
Instead, Proposition 1-2-3 would:
1. allow tenants of two years or more to buy their units, whether they are under rent control or not.
2. exempt single-family homes from rent control if they have been owner-occupied for two years or more. The rule would apply to owners who move out and rent their former homes to tenants.
3. create a fund for poor tenants using two-thirds of the increase in city revenue caused when tenants buy their units, thus converting them into condominiums. This part of the proposition would impose a "means test" only to decide who should receive money from the fund.
Want to keep up with breaking news? Subscribe to our email newsletter.