News
In Fight Against Trump, Harvard Goes From Media Lockdown to the Limelight
News
The Changing Meaning and Lasting Power of the Harvard Name
News
Can Harvard Bring Students’ Focus Back to the Classroom?
News
Harvard Activists Have a New Reason To Protest. Does Palestine Fit In?
News
Strings Attached: How Harvard’s Wealthiest Alumni Are Reshaping University Giving
An article on page three of yesterday's Crimson incorrectly described realtor Fred Meyer's initiative petition, Proposition 1-2-3.
The petition, which supporters want to place on the 1989 municipal ballot, would not use a "means test" to let only low-income tenants live in rent-controlled housing. Such a law would be illegal.
Instead, Proposition 1-2-3 would:
1. allow tenants of two years or more to buy their units, whether they are under rent control or not.
2. exempt single-family homes from rent control if they have been owner-occupied for two years or more. The rule would apply to owners who move out and rent their former homes to tenants.
3. create a fund for poor tenants using two-thirds of the increase in city revenue caused when tenants buy their units, thus converting them into condominiums. This part of the proposition would impose a "means test" only to decide who should receive money from the fund.
Want to keep up with breaking news? Subscribe to our email newsletter.