News
Harvard Medical School Cancels Student Groups’ Pro-Palestine Vigil
News
Former FTC Chair Lina Khan Urges Democrats to Rethink Federal Agency Function at IOP Forum
News
Cyanobacteria Advisory Expected To Lift Before Head of the Charles Regatta
News
After QuOffice’s Closure, Its Staff Are No Longer Confidential Resources for Students Reporting Sexual Misconduct
News
Harvard Still On Track To Reach Fossil Fuel-Neutral Status by 2026, Sustainability Report Finds
Question Three would require the state to set new regulations against inhumane treatment of farm animals. They would cover methods of transportation and slaughter as well as feeding and housing standards, and would impose a penalty for violation of $1000.
It would also set up an advisory board to recommend new rules to the state Commissioner of Agriculture and would enable the board to create a fund to help farmers obey the new rules, as long as the legislature appropriated the money.
The question, which is binding, reached the ballot by initiative petition after nearly unanimous defeat by both houses of the legislature in May of 1988.
Those who favor the regulations cite the poor treatment of veal calves, chickens, and the use of drugs that could endanger consumer health on some confined animals.
Opponents say that the regulations would hurt Massachusetts farms, which are too poor to pay the cost of obeying them. They say the state's existing animal welfare regulatory system is effective, and does not need additional laws.
Want to keep up with breaking news? Subscribe to our email newsletter.