News

Shark Tank Star Kevin O’Leary Judges Six Harvard Startups at HBS Competition

News

The Return to Test Requirements Shrank Harvard’s Applicant Pool. Will It Change Harvard Classrooms?

News

HGSE Program Partners with States to Evaluate, Identify Effective Education Policies

News

Planning Group Releases Proposed Bylaws for a Faculty Senate at Harvard

News

How Cambridge’s Political Power Brokers Shape the 2025 Election

The Committee on Rights and Responsibilities

NO WRITER ATTRIBUTED

Amid student unrest in 1969. Harvard created the Committee on Rights and Responsibilities (CRR) to discipline students violating freedoms guaranteed by the Faculty's Resolution on Rights and Responsibilities (RRR).

Two weeks ago, the Faculty Council called on the CRR--which has not heard a case since 1975 to decide the cases of students involved in the Quincy St and Lowell House anti-apartheid protests.

The CRR is the only disciplinary body in which students can actively participate. Yet throughout the 1970s House committees boycotted the CRR charging that it could punish students for their political beliefs without appeal to a higher body.

In 1980, Harvard discontinued its annual request for student delegates to the committee, but renewed the offer when the Faculty Council reactivated the CRR...

The CRR is ideally composed of six Faculty members, six randomly chosen student delegates and one Faculty chairman who votes only in case of a tie. But because House committees refused to send delegates, the CRR can proceed without student members.

Students accused of violating the RRR may defend themselves in person before the CRR, which can administer any College punishment, except for dismissal or expulsion, which require Faculty approval.

Want to keep up with breaking news? Subscribe to our email newsletter.

Tags