News
Garber Announces Advisory Committee for Harvard Law School Dean Search
News
First Harvard Prize Book in Kosovo Established by Harvard Alumni
News
Ryan Murdock ’25 Remembered as Dedicated Advocate and Caring Friend
News
Harvard Faculty Appeal Temporary Suspensions From Widener Library
News
Man Who Managed Clients for High-End Cambridge Brothel Network Pleads Guilty
House Committee chairmen Friday unanimously voted to postpone until next fall the decision on whether to end a 15-year student boycott of the Committee on Rights and Responsibilities (CRR).
Following an afternoon meeting with Dean of Students Archic C. Epps III, the chairmen of all 13 Houses and the Freshman Council said in a letter to Epps that they were not given enough time to consider whether the CRR is a legitimate body or to hold proper elections of delegates.
The 13-member, student-faculty CRR was formed to discipline students in the wake of the April 1969 University Hall takeover. It has not convened since 1978 and has not heard a case since 1975.
Students have boycotted the CRR almost continuously since 1970, charging that the body can be-used to punish students for their political beliels without appeal.
The Faculty Council last week reactivated the CRR to hear the cases of students involved in two recent antiapartheid protests; the April 24 occupation of the 17 Quincy St. headquarters of Harvard's seven-man governing Corporation, and the May 2 blockade of a South African diplomat in the Lowell House room where he was speaking.
Not Politically Oriented
House Committee chairmen interviewed yesterday said their letter does not specifically call for a politically motivated boycott. Rather, they asked that the faculty not convene the CRR until the issues of its legitimacy are resolved.
"The letter is not a boycott--it is a request for more time," said Currier House Committee Chairman Dcborah Ramirez '86.
The CRR has perenially come under fire from some students because it does not grant appeals to students it tries. The body has also been attacked because of the intense peer pressure suffered by student delegates who sat on the committee in its earliest years.
Unlike the Administrative Board--the College's traditional disciplinary body--the CRR allows student delegates to participate actively in disciplinary proceedings.
The CRR also permits students accused of violating the Resolution on Rights and Responsibilities (RRR)--the 1970 University legislation concerning freedoms of speech and movement that the CRR is directed to uphold--to defend themselves in person before the committee.
Want to keep up with breaking news? Subscribe to our email newsletter.