News

Garber Announces Advisory Committee for Harvard Law School Dean Search

News

First Harvard Prize Book in Kosovo Established by Harvard Alumni

News

Ryan Murdock ’25 Remembered as Dedicated Advocate and Caring Friend

News

Harvard Faculty Appeal Temporary Suspensions From Widener Library

News

Man Who Managed Clients for High-End Cambridge Brothel Network Pleads Guilty

Cambridge to Pick Cable Franchise

Winds Up Expensive Two Year Bidding Process

By Thomas J. Winslow

Selecting the first-year cable television franchise for a city the size of Cambridge has been no simple or inexpensive task.

Just ask the three cable companies currently vying for Cambridge's lucrative television market and a 15-year contract. According to one estimate, each franchise spent between $300,000 and $500,000 in the cable application process. One firm, American Cablevision Corporation, budgeted more than $100,000 for video presentations and three marketing surveys throughout the City alone as part of the competitive franchise one-upsmanship. Cambridge's cable contract could be worth as much as $32 million, says Cambridge Cable Commissioner Joseph G. Sakey.

Ask the City's specially-created Office of Cable Television--which operates on an annual budget of $139,000 and employees a staff of three--for a glance at the 300-page report of state mandated rules which guided the cable franchises through the bidding process. Or request a peak at the transcripts of more than eleven hours of public hearings conducted in January.

Ask City Manager Robert W. Healy, the City's top municipal administrator, who must pour over thousands of pages of promises by the cable franchises and must weigh the merits of each company before awarding a preliminary license next month.

Ask any of these people and you'll find it hasn't been easy since Cambridge voters gave the City permission to bid for a cable franchise in a 1982 referendum.

Boston's Problems

Cambridge waited more than 10 years before opening bidding for its cable license last February--in part to conduct a more thorough and informed selection process, Sakey said.

The City has been watching the three year old love-hate relationship between Boston and Cablevision Systems Corporation, one cable company which, observers say, promised more than it could deliver.

According to Sakey, Cambridge demanded that the three cable applicants include provisions for public access to local cable stations, wiring the public school system, a realistic timetable for construction of the system, and an effective mechanism for dealing with consumer complaints.

While most cities concentrate on the number of viewing options provided by a bidder--such as Home Box Office and the Playboy Channel, the Cambridge cable television competition has been dominated by the issue of public access to the eventual cable franchise.

"Because Cambridge is such an intellectual, ethnic and diverse community, its citizens want to make their own programs rather than subscribe to canned or packaged shows," says Susan Peck of the Cambridge Cablevision Corporation (3C).

The other two contenders are American Cablesystems Corporation, the nation's 29th largest cable firm which operates out of Beverly, Mass., and Cambridge Consumer-Owned Telecommunications, Inc. (Cable Plus), a cooperative company founded by Cantabrigians.

People's Choice

Although the final decision rests with the city manager, Cambridge residents prefer one company or show no interest in the process at all.

Most residents polled at the City's two cable hearings in January chose Cable Plus over the other competitors, mostly because of flexibility in programming and services of a local cable firm owned by subscribers.

"There's great experimental value in terms of the composition of cable companies in the country," says Susan Fleischmann, adding that only Davis, Calif. and Oberlin, Ohio, currently have cable franchises that are cooperatives. "It's a real risk, but one that Cambridge should take."

"Harvard students will be very interested in pursuing the option of local access with Cable Plus," adds the company's spokesman, Anthony Gill '73, citing numerous opportunities for student-produced programming and cable television internships.

But other cable television observers in Massachusetts, like Ralph Burns of Belmont, choose American hands down. "They're better organized, better financed, and I'm impressed with their candor."

"The assumption is that because they're the only privately owned business, they can't provide the service to the community," says Margie Smigel, a local independent producer, adding. "American is into local programming."

American services nine Mass. communities, has laid 300 miles of cable in the state, and has assets approaching $250 million, American spokesman Terry M. Soley said.

Eleventh Hour

Construction of the city's cable system could begin as soon this June, if the city manager selects a cable company in March and grants a preliminary license soon after, as scheduled.

"I'd like to grant a final license as soon as possible so that we can make the best use of the summer construction months." Healy said last week.

Both Cable Plus and 3C said they expect to wire the City within 24 months, while American said the job could be completed within one year.

Want to keep up with breaking news? Subscribe to our email newsletter.

Tags