News

Harvard Medical School Cancels Student Groups’ Pro-Palestine Vigil

News

Former FTC Chair Lina Khan Urges Democrats to Rethink Federal Agency Function at IOP Forum

News

Cyanobacteria Advisory Expected To Lift Before Head of the Charles Regatta

News

After QuOffice’s Closure, Its Staff Are No Longer Confidential Resources for Students Reporting Sexual Misconduct

News

Harvard Still On Track To Reach Fossil Fuel-Neutral Status by 2026, Sustainability Report Finds

Nuclear Experts Debate Proliferation

Short Takes

NO WRITER ATTRIBUTED

Five nuclear experts last night debated the prospects and management of proliferation at a Center for International Affairs-sponsored forum.

The panelists, from institutions including the Nuclear Control Institute and MIT, discussed the nuclear race from a technological, national security and third-world perspective.

The forum, which took place at the Kennedy School, was moderated by Albert Carnesale, public policy professor at the K-school and coauthor of the widely acclaimed text "Hawks, Doves and Owls."

Two panelists agreed that the nuclear proliferation is primarily a security problem. "We must stop kidding ourselves about our security. We develop more bomb programs when we are insecure," said Roger Molander, the president of the Washington-based Roosevelt Center for American Political Studies.

Another, calling himself a pessimist, made the distinction between long-run and short-run hopes. "The short run can limit the likelihood of time the countries that want to get into the weapons business have, but I can't be very optimistic about where we're going in the long run," said George Rathjens, political science professor at MIT.

Lewis Dunn. assistant director of the Bureau of Nuclear and Weapons Control, said that the world is sorely in need of innovative ideas to control the spread of nuclear weapons, but that proliferation is not the United States's most important issue at this time.

Want to keep up with breaking news? Subscribe to our email newsletter.

Tags