News

After Court Restores Research Funding, Trump Still Has Paths to Target Harvard

News

‘Honestly, I’m Fine with It’: Eliot Residents Settle In to the Inn as Renovations Begin

News

He Represented Paul Toner. Now, He’s the Fundraising Frontrunner in Cambridge’s Municipal Elections.

News

Harvard College Laundry Prices Increase by 25 Cents

News

DOJ Sues Boston and Mayor Michelle Wu ’07 Over Sanctuary City Policy

A Great Leap Backward

SHAREHOLDER ETHICS

NO WRITER ATTRIBUTED

THE CORPORATION SUBCOMMITTEE that votes on shareholder resolutions last week took a decisive step backwards. In a discussion with the Advisory Committee on Shareholder Responsibility (ACSR), which advises the Corporation on investment ethics, the subcommittee stated that Harvard need not consider a company's moral standing before deciding to invest in a company--not even to the point of checking whether the company has signed minimum-labor guidelines. A stock only takes on moral dimensions, the committee would have us believe, after it has been bought--just in time to set in motion the lengthy bureaucratic struggles the ACSR must go through to recommend selling it again.

The ACSR, whose existence as a screening body would be rendered entirely useless by this principle, has sensibly drafted a statement to tonight's Corporation meeting, urging Harvard to consult screening guidelines before buying a stock. We urge the Corporation to pay attention to this commonsense recommendation. Any other course would undercut the whole concept of shareholder responsibility and compromise morality for sophistry.

Want to keep up with breaking news? Subscribe to our email newsletter.

Tags