News
Harvard Researchers Develop AI-Driven Framework To Study Social Interactions, A Step Forward for Autism Research
News
Harvard Innovation Labs Announces 25 President’s Innovation Challenge Finalists
News
Graduate Student Council To Vote on Meeting Attendance Policy
News
Pop Hits and Politics: At Yardfest, Students Dance to Bedingfield and a Student Band Condemns Trump
News
Billionaire Investor Gerald Chan Under Scrutiny for Neglect of Historic Harvard Square Theater
THE CORPORATION SUBCOMMITTEE that votes on shareholder resolutions last week took a decisive step backwards. In a discussion with the Advisory Committee on Shareholder Responsibility (ACSR), which advises the Corporation on investment ethics, the subcommittee stated that Harvard need not consider a company's moral standing before deciding to invest in a company--not even to the point of checking whether the company has signed minimum-labor guidelines. A stock only takes on moral dimensions, the committee would have us believe, after it has been bought--just in time to set in motion the lengthy bureaucratic struggles the ACSR must go through to recommend selling it again.
The ACSR, whose existence as a screening body would be rendered entirely useless by this principle, has sensibly drafted a statement to tonight's Corporation meeting, urging Harvard to consult screening guidelines before buying a stock. We urge the Corporation to pay attention to this commonsense recommendation. Any other course would undercut the whole concept of shareholder responsibility and compromise morality for sophistry.
Want to keep up with breaking news? Subscribe to our email newsletter.