News

After Court Restores Research Funding, Trump Still Has Paths to Target Harvard

News

‘Honestly, I’m Fine with It’: Eliot Residents Settle In to the Inn as Renovations Begin

News

He Represented Paul Toner. Now, He’s the Fundraising Frontrunner in Cambridge’s Municipal Elections.

News

Harvard College Laundry Prices Increase by 25 Cents

News

DOJ Sues Boston and Mayor Michelle Wu ’07 Over Sanctuary City Policy

'Baby Students'

THE MAIL

NO WRITER ATTRIBUTED

To The Editors of The Crimson:

Who were those effete baby students at the Buckley-Galbraith debate (just saw it) on Reaganomics who cheered in support of Reagan's policies? According to the St. Louis Fed, the effects of fiscal policy sum to zip in five quarters. The expansion of the middle 60s was caused by monetary policy, not the tax cut of '64, as any good money and banking text should explain. Supply-siders are incompetent Republican Keynesians who can't even think clearly enough to do bookkeeping. The monetarist analysis is correct--ask any physicist or math major.

The professional supply-side economists are not against social and anti-poverty programs: Reagan isn't even a good supply-sider. He is trying to implement opinions that were proved wrong at least 50 years ago, to cut welfare, food stamps. CETA jobs and training, and force poor people to earn honest livings in drug-dealing, prostitution, car theft and mugging. Some may find good careers as Mafia executives. In applying for jobs, poor people should be persuasive--would a Saturday Night Special be sufficient? No, I don't like Reagan's policies. Reaganomics is very socially destructive--it is class war. John R. Tellefson   A Kansas Liberal

Want to keep up with breaking news? Subscribe to our email newsletter.

Tags