News
Cambridge Nonprofits Struggle to Fill Gap Left By SNAP Delay
News
At Harvard Talk, Princeton President Says Colleges Should Set Clear Time, Manner, Place Rules for Protests
News
In Tug-of-War Over Harvard Salient’s Future, Board of Directors Lawyers Up
News
Cambridge Elects 2 Challengers with 7 Incumbents to City Council
News
‘We Need More Setti Warrens’: IOP Director and Newton Mayor Remembered for Rare Drive to Serve
If art in America and Britain is to be "democratized," its financial support must come primarily from the public rather than the private sector, a visiting art expert said last night.
Addressing a crowd of about 150 people at the Kennedy School of Government, Sir Rov Shaw, secretary-general of the Arts Council of Great Britain (ACGB), said, "The principal source of art subsidy should be the state."
Shaw added that only with financial support from public organizations like the ACGB and its American counterpart, the National Endowment for the Arts, (NEA) can art "be made effective outside the clique of the learned and the wealthy."
"Subsidies from business can be capricious." Shaw said, adding, "Often-times businesses use their financial support of artistic productions like the theatre and the opera as public relations campaigns."
Public financial support creates its own unique problems. For example, the British government does not directly influence the arts agency's administrative decisions, but Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher has cut the ACGB's $85-million budget by $3 million in the last three years.
Shaw added, however, that the American NEA, whose budget was recently cut in half, faces worse fiscal problems. "Mr. Reagan is ahead of Mrs. Thatcher in these things." Shaw said.
Want to keep up with breaking news? Subscribe to our email newsletter.