News

Harvard Medical School Cancels Student Groups’ Pro-Palestine Vigil

News

Former FTC Chair Lina Khan Urges Democrats to Rethink Federal Agency Function at IOP Forum

News

Cyanobacteria Advisory Expected To Lift Before Head of the Charles Regatta

News

After QuOffice’s Closure, Its Staff Are No Longer Confidential Resources for Students Reporting Sexual Misconduct

News

Harvard Still On Track To Reach Fossil Fuel-Neutral Status by 2026, Sustainability Report Finds

Supreme Court

News Shorts

NO WRITER ATTRIBUTED

The Supreme Court decided yesterday to hear a case about whether the nation's public schools and colleges must hire interpreters to help deaf students in their classwork.

The case arises from the University of Texas' appeal of a lower court's ruling that the university, under the 1973 Rehabilitation Act, must pay for the classroom interpreter of a deaf student, Walter Canenisch.

The Court's decision could affect private as well as public schools, because the act prohibits institutions receiving federal aid from discriminating against any "otherwise qualified handicapped in dividual."

Thomas E. Crooks, special assistant to Dean Rosovsky, said yesterday that a ruling in Camenisch's favor would probably not affect Harvard's current policy. "Handicapped students are now supported by some rehabilitation service, state or otherwise," he said, adding that the University already pays for "the occasional student who cannot find help elsewhere."

Crooks said that there is only one deaf student at the present who requires an interpreter in class.

Want to keep up with breaking news? Subscribe to our email newsletter.

Tags