News
Summers Will Not Finish Semester of Teaching as Harvard Investigates Epstein Ties
News
Harvard College Students Report Favoring Divestment from Israel in HUA Survey
News
‘He Should Resign’: Harvard Undergrads Take Hard Line Against Summers Over Epstein Scandal
News
Harvard To Launch New Investigation Into Epstein’s Ties to Summers, Other University Affiliates
News
Harvard Students To Vote on Divestment From Israel in Inaugural HUA Election Survey
The Senate yesterday handed President Carter his greatest energy victory since August 1977 by approving a natural gas deregulation compromise which had been stalled for seventeen months.
The bill, which is a product of difficult negotiations between Congress and Energy Secretary James R. Schlesinger '50, provides for the lifting of most federal natural gas price controls by 1985. The bill now goes to the House.
House leaders hope to combine the gas bill with other, less controversial parts of the President's energy plan and vote on the entire package just before the scheduled mid-October Congressional adjournment. The House passed most other parts of Carter's energy package in August 1977.
Passed Gas
Supporters of the bill say it will allow enough new gas to be found to reduce oil imports by about 1.5 million barrels a day by 1985. They also claim that the measure will add only about $25 a year to the average family's heating bill.
Liberal opponents counter that the additional heating costs for the average family will be $100 or more annually. The Congressional Budget Office has estimated the proposal will cost consumers who heat with gas about $16 billion in higher bills through 1985.
The White House had lobbied heavily in favor of the legislation. Administration officials said the measure was the most important surviving portion of the energy package President Carter submitted to Congress in April 1977.
Sen. Henry M. Jackson (D-Wash.), chairman of the Senate Energy Committee, said yesterday the compromise "will provide the incentives for increased production," thereby enabling the United States to ease its heavy dependence on imported oil.
However, Sen. Howard Metzenbaum (D-Ohio), one of the bill's leading opponents, said it was a "prescription for disaster" and accused the Administration of ignoring the major consumer, farm, and labor groups opposing the bill just to obtain a long-denied Congressional victory.
Want to keep up with breaking news? Subscribe to our email newsletter.