News
Garber Announces Advisory Committee for Harvard Law School Dean Search
News
First Harvard Prize Book in Kosovo Established by Harvard Alumni
News
Ryan Murdock ’25 Remembered as Dedicated Advocate and Caring Friend
News
Harvard Faculty Appeal Temporary Suspensions From Widener Library
News
Man Who Managed Clients for High-End Cambridge Brothel Network Pleads Guilty
The five selective concentrations--History and Literature, History of Science, the Comparative Study of Religion, Social Studies, and Visual and Environmental Studies--have each accepted roughly the same number of students this spring as they did last year.
The Faculty Council charter that established the concentration of the Comparative Study of Religion limits to ten the number of concentrators that program may accept each year. The other four "elite" majors impose their own limits, based on budgets and resources.
The Comparative Study of Religion program could accomodate 13 or 14 students per class if the charter did not restrict it, William A. Graham Jr., head tutor in the Religion program, said yesterday.
"Everyone who applied to the Religion department this year, with one exception, was certainly acceptable," Graham said.
The program's faculty committee accepted eight of its 14 applicants, leaving two spaces open for transfer students and other fall term applicants, Graham said.
Amanda T. Segal '80, a History and Literature concentrator, said yesterday that although she was pleased the committee had accepted her, she had reservations about any selective preogram.
"Everyone at Harvard is part of an elite, so people in limited concentrations are sort of the elite of the elite," Segal said.
Gary F. Mathias '80, one of 75 students who were not admitted to the Social Studies department, said yesterday he felt the yearly cost of tuition should entitle students to concentrate in whatever field they want.
Mathias said he considered the selection process to be arbitrary. "I don't think it's right that a ten-minute interview with a grad student should decide my academic future," he added.
The Committee on Undergraduate Education (CUE) recommended in April that the Faculty Council open up the elite concentrations and rely upon the stringency of department requirements to limit the number of concentrators.
Francis M. Pipkin, associate dean of the Faculty and CUE chairman, said yesterday the CUE recommendation addresses only the problem of arbitrary selection.
The recommendation does not functionally open the elite concentrations up to more students, however, because the budgets and resources remain the same, Pipkin said.
Want to keep up with breaking news? Subscribe to our email newsletter.