News

Harvard College Will Ignore Student Magazine Article Echoing Hitler Unless It Faces Complaints, Deming Says

News

Hoekstra Says Harvard’s Faculty of Arts and Sciences Is ‘On Stronger Footing’ After Cost-Cutting

News

Housing Day To Be Held Friday After Spring Recess in Break From Tradition

News

Eversource Proposes 13% Increase in Gas Rates This Winter

News

Student Employees Left Out of Work and In the Dark After Harvard’s Diversity Office Closures

Court Decision

NO WRITER ATTRIBUTED

The Supreme Court's refusal to hear a homosexual discrimination case will not have a great impact on future legal decisions, two Harvard law professors said yesterday.

The Supreme Court declined Monday to hear the appeal of James Gaylord, a Washington State high school teacher who was fired in 1972 when school officials learned of his homosexuality.

The Washington State Supreme Court had ruled earlier that homosexuals act immorally and can therefore be fired from their jobs.

Alan Dershowitz, professor of Law, said there can be a "danger in reading too much into Supreme Court decisions." He added that the court may have decided to hear the case for a variety of reasons, including popular opinion.

Laurence H. Tribe '62, professor of Law, said, "The rights of adults to determine their own sexual preferences remains unresolved." He said he found Court's decision "disappointing, but not surprising."

Dershowitz said that despite the ruling, he is "confident the court in future years will find discrimination based on sexual preferences unconstitutional."

Want to keep up with breaking news? Subscribe to our email newsletter.

Tags