News
Penny Pritzker Says She Has ‘Absolutely No Idea’ How Trump Talks Will Conclude
News
Harvard Researchers Find Executive Function Tests May Be Culturally Biased
News
Researchers Release Report on People Enslaved by Harvard-Affiliated Vassall Family
News
Zusy Seeks First Full Term for Cambridge City Council
News
NYT Journalist Maggie Haberman Weighs In on Trump’s White House, Democratic Strategy at Harvard Talk
The Advisory Committee on Shareholder Responsibility (ACSR) came through with few surprises and no major controversies this spring. It merely continued on its moderately liberal way on most proxy issues, guided by a consistent majority of the committee.
Set up by President Bok in the aftermath of a Mass Hall takeover in 1972 over the University's ownership of stock in Gulf Oil--which had extensive holdings in the then-Portuguese colony of Angola--the ACSR had one opportunity this year to give a general opinion on corporate responsibility: its April response to a Securities and Exchange Commission ruling soliciting investors' opinions on amending present corporate disclosure regulations.
The ACSR came out for broader public disclosure of corporations' equal employment hiring trends, political contributions and environmental impact of corporate activities, advising the SEC that such measures were necessary to insure shareholders' "knowledge."
Still, behind the committee's opinion was a liberal hope--stated by some members--that broader disclosure rules would shame many corporations into making internal reforms. The Corporation Subcommittee on Shareholder Responsibility endorsed the ACSR's letter to the SEC.
Want to keep up with breaking news? Subscribe to our email newsletter.