News
Penny Pritzker Says She Has ‘Absolutely No Idea’ How Trump Talks Will Conclude
News
Harvard Researchers Find Executive Function Tests May Be Culturally Biased
News
Researchers Release Report on People Enslaved by Harvard-Affiliated Vassall Family
News
Zusy Seeks First Full Term for Cambridge City Council
News
NYT Journalist Maggie Haberman Weighs In on Trump’s White House, Democratic Strategy at Harvard Talk
On the surface, the 1974 Buckley Amendment, giving students a chance to see confidential material in their files, seems a totally positive move for the students. But it may result in a change in admissions procedure that would be detrimental to all but those students with outstanding academic records.
Admissions is not an exact science and officials say they use recommendations, school reports and interviews to fill out the objective data of test scores, class rank and grades to make a flesh-and-blood picture of a candidate.
Admissions officials contend that the Buckley law aggravated a trend in bland teacher and school recommendations, weakening their usefulness in providing that full picture. The more imprecise recommendations become, the more Harvard will be forced to rely on that objective data.
L. Fred Jewett '57, dean of admissions and financial aid, says increased reliance on objective data could make admission of non-traditional students--those coming from a background lacking in strong academic reinforcement--more difficult.
Want to keep up with breaking news? Subscribe to our email newsletter.