News
Harvard Medical School Cancels Student Groups’ Pro-Palestine Vigil
News
Former FTC Chair Lina Khan Urges Democrats to Rethink Federal Agency Function at IOP Forum
News
Cyanobacteria Advisory Expected To Lift Before Head of the Charles Regatta
News
After QuOffice’s Closure, Its Staff Are No Longer Confidential Resources for Students Reporting Sexual Misconduct
News
Harvard Still On Track To Reach Fossil Fuel-Neutral Status by 2026, Sustainability Report Finds
To the Editors of The Crimson:
Monday's Dump Truck on the 1969 strike was, I thought, excellently written and, more important, a well-timed reminder. The '69 strike certainly should not be for gotten. But why insist on the contrast between the activism of the late sixties and the apathy and self-centeredness of the present, as in the article "Freshmen Know Little About Strike" in the same issue of The Crimson? Time Magazine, Newsweek, The New York Times do enough of that, with their constant harping on streaking, pre-meds and apathy. True, these things exist, but the picture is not that simple and the image of riots in the Yard versus frisbees in the Yard is too facile. What about support shown for movements centered around issues such as one-to-one admissions, Middle South Utilities's prospective Arkansas power plant, the Shockley-Innis debate? What about the clearly deeply sympathetic feeling for the 1969 strike manifested in The Crimson's supplement? These movements and that feeling are admittedly a very long way from attaining the spirit of that strike, but we cannot let ourselves settle self-indulgently into the image of us that Time Magazine is so eager to promote. Jenny Netzer '76
Want to keep up with breaking news? Subscribe to our email newsletter.