News
Harvard Medical School Cancels Student Groups’ Pro-Palestine Vigil
News
Former FTC Chair Lina Khan Urges Democrats to Rethink Federal Agency Function at IOP Forum
News
Cyanobacteria Advisory Expected To Lift Before Head of the Charles Regatta
News
After QuOffice’s Closure, Its Staff Are No Longer Confidential Resources for Students Reporting Sexual Misconduct
News
Harvard Still On Track To Reach Fossil Fuel-Neutral Status by 2026, Sustainability Report Finds
To the Editors of The Crimson:
We disagree with The Crimson editorial, "Keep Sex Ratios," which states: "As long as Harvard does not have a 1 to 1 admissions policy and therefore remains a male-dominated place, women should be guaranteed the option of living somewhere that is not overwhelmingly male."
In the first place, we are not aware that women who choose to matriculate here need a guaranteed enclave. The desire for one implies that Harvard men see Radcliffe women as a precious commodity, to be shared around equally.
More importantly, the debate over sex ratios obscures the issue of equal admissions, which should be our concern. Unfortunately, the reverse of the statement quoted above is equally persuasive: as long as women are guaranteed a place that is not overwhelmingly male, Harvard does not need a one-to-one admissions policy.
Administration officials should not be so persuaded. Let us make the end of sexual discriminations of any kind at Harvard a preliminary to vigorous student support for equal admissions. Thomas McElligott '74 Robert Boucheron '74 James M. Smith '75
Want to keep up with breaking news? Subscribe to our email newsletter.