News

Harvard Quietly Resolves Anti-Palestinian Discrimination Complaint With Ed. Department

News

Following Dining Hall Crowds, Harvard College Won’t Say Whether It Tracked Wintersession Move-Ins

News

Harvard Outsources Program to Identify Descendants of Those Enslaved by University Affiliates, Lays Off Internal Staff

News

Harvard Medical School Cancels Class Session With Gazan Patients, Calling It One-Sided

News

Garber Privately Tells Faculty That Harvard Must Rethink Messaging After GOP Victory

How the Survey Was Done

NO WRITER ATTRIBUTED

This first Crimson survey is the result of 397 telephone interviews with randomly selected undergraduates.

The Crimson selected students for the sample from a computer-generated list of random dormitory telephone numbers, and conducted the interviews in the late afternoons and evenings last week.

The Crimson staff members who did the nearly 400 four-minute interviews had only the telephone numbers of the people called, so all respondents remain anonymous.

Almost without exception, undergraduates were willing to take the time to answer the 15 Crimson questions.

Statistically, the results of the survey have a standard error of between 3 and 6 per cent at a 95 per cent confidence interval. This means that for 19 of every 20 samples, the results received will be within a few per cent of the actual figure for the complete undergraduate body.

The Crimson is reporting differences in the responses for crosstabulated variables only if they are significant at a level of less than .05. This means, for example, that a difference in preference for equal access admissions broken down by sex was reported only if there was a less than one out of twenty chance that the difference could have occurred by chance.

The key demographic characteristics of The Crimson sample for sex, House, class and concentration are all within 5 per cent of the actual figures for the undergraduate population.

Want to keep up with breaking news? Subscribe to our email newsletter.

Tags