News
After Court Restores Research Funding, Trump Still Has Paths to Target Harvard
News
‘Honestly, I’m Fine with It’: Eliot Residents Settle In to the Inn as Renovations Begin
News
He Represented Paul Toner. Now, He’s the Fundraising Frontrunner in Cambridge’s Municipal Elections.
News
Harvard College Laundry Prices Increase by 25 Cents
News
DOJ Sues Boston and Mayor Michelle Wu ’07 Over Sanctuary City Policy
Harvard's radical political groups and the Commission of Inquiry should be good for each other. The radicals give the Commission the publicity it wants, and the Commission gives the radicals an official University outlet for their complaints.
Last week the radicals presented the Commission with an issue that could bring it into prominence as a major force in the University--a detailed brief charging that the Economics Department's hiring policy is politically biased.
The Commission has not yet decided whether to hold hearings on the charge--based on an earlier, less specific complaint signed by SDS, the New American Movement, and the Union of Radical Political Economists--but Commission chairman James S. Ackerman, professor of Fine Arts, said, "This kind of charge is within the jurisdiction of the Commission."
But both Ackerman and Francis R. Lonergan '72-4, an SDS member who helped draft the earlier complaint, seemed to be somewhat disenchanted with the apparently ideal relationship.
Ackerman said that he wasn't sure if the radical groups were sincerely interested in reforming the University through the Commission or "if they just want to show that we're a pawn of the Administration."
And Lonergan, disappointed at the Commission's refusal earlier this month to investigate the allegedly racist teaching of Richard Herrnstein, professor of Psychology, said, "I don't think the Commission will take the challenge we've given them."
Want to keep up with breaking news? Subscribe to our email newsletter.