News

Community Safety Department Director To Resign Amid Tension With Cambridge Police Department

News

From Lab to Startup: Harvard’s Office of Technology Development Paves the Way for Research Commercialization

News

People’s Forum on Graduation Readiness Held After Vote to Eliminate MCAS

News

FAS Closes Barker Center Cafe, Citing Financial Strain

News

8 Takeaways From Harvard’s Task Force Reports

Faculty Defers Action On Retirement

PENSIONERS:

By Andrew P. Corty

The Faculty is not rushing into any decision on new retirement procedures. After a year-long study, the Faculty has debated the issue of redefining the retirement age twice since last November.

The motion proposed by Herbert D. Bloch, professor of Greek and Latin, recommends that more professors taper off their Harvard committments rather than abruptly retiring at age 66, the normal retirement age, or at age 70, the retirement age when an extension has been granted.

At the April meeting on Tuesday, four senior Faculty members took up one hour for debate, and the possibility for further debate seems endless.

Every senior Faculty member seems to have a different conception of the ideal retirement age and different ideas about whom should be consulted in the decision.

The Faculty also disposed of a motion condemning the United States involvement in Vietnam, defeating it by an overwhelming majority.

In other business, the Faculty members heard a progress report from Robert J. Kiely, associate dean of the Faculty, concerning the freshman year, the three year A.B. and calendar reform.

Want to keep up with breaking news? Subscribe to our email newsletter.

Tags