News
Harvard Medical School Cancels Student Groups’ Pro-Palestine Vigil
News
Former FTC Chair Lina Khan Urges Democrats to Rethink Federal Agency Function at IOP Forum
News
Cyanobacteria Advisory Expected To Lift Before Head of the Charles Regatta
News
After QuOffice’s Closure, Its Staff Are No Longer Confidential Resources for Students Reporting Sexual Misconduct
News
Harvard Still On Track To Reach Fossil Fuel-Neutral Status by 2026, Sustainability Report Finds
The Faculty is not rushing into any decision on new retirement procedures. After a year-long study, the Faculty has debated the issue of redefining the retirement age twice since last November.
The motion proposed by Herbert D. Bloch, professor of Greek and Latin, recommends that more professors taper off their Harvard committments rather than abruptly retiring at age 66, the normal retirement age, or at age 70, the retirement age when an extension has been granted.
At the April meeting on Tuesday, four senior Faculty members took up one hour for debate, and the possibility for further debate seems endless.
Every senior Faculty member seems to have a different conception of the ideal retirement age and different ideas about whom should be consulted in the decision.
The Faculty also disposed of a motion condemning the United States involvement in Vietnam, defeating it by an overwhelming majority.
In other business, the Faculty members heard a progress report from Robert J. Kiely, associate dean of the Faculty, concerning the freshman year, the three year A.B. and calendar reform.
Want to keep up with breaking news? Subscribe to our email newsletter.