News
Harvard Quietly Resolves Anti-Palestinian Discrimination Complaint With Ed. Department
News
Following Dining Hall Crowds, Harvard College Won’t Say Whether It Tracked Wintersession Move-Ins
News
Harvard Outsources Program to Identify Descendants of Those Enslaved by University Affiliates, Lays Off Internal Staff
News
Harvard Medical School Cancels Class Session With Gazan Patients, Calling It One-Sided
News
Garber Privately Tells Faculty That Harvard Must Rethink Messaging After GOP Victory
The Faculty is not rushing into any decision on new retirement procedures. After a year-long study, the Faculty has debated the issue of redefining the retirement age twice since last November.
The motion proposed by Herbert D. Bloch, professor of Greek and Latin, recommends that more professors taper off their Harvard committments rather than abruptly retiring at age 66, the normal retirement age, or at age 70, the retirement age when an extension has been granted.
At the April meeting on Tuesday, four senior Faculty members took up one hour for debate, and the possibility for further debate seems endless.
Every senior Faculty member seems to have a different conception of the ideal retirement age and different ideas about whom should be consulted in the decision.
The Faculty also disposed of a motion condemning the United States involvement in Vietnam, defeating it by an overwhelming majority.
In other business, the Faculty members heard a progress report from Robert J. Kiely, associate dean of the Faculty, concerning the freshman year, the three year A.B. and calendar reform.
Want to keep up with breaking news? Subscribe to our email newsletter.