News
After Court Restores Research Funding, Trump Still Has Paths to Target Harvard
News
‘Honestly, I’m Fine with It’: Eliot Residents Settle In to the Inn as Renovations Begin
News
He Represented Paul Toner. Now, He’s the Fundraising Frontrunner in Cambridge’s Municipal Elections.
News
Harvard College Laundry Prices Increase by 25 Cents
News
DOJ Sues Boston and Mayor Michelle Wu ’07 Over Sanctuary City Policy
A United States District Court judge yesterday invalidated Massachusett's six-month residency requirement for voting.
The decision will not affect voting in the April 25th presidential primary, Attorney General Robert Quinn said yesterday. He explained that the ruling abolishes the residency requirement only for future state and local elections.
The only residency stipulation still presently in force in Massachusetts is the 30-day requirement established by Congress for presidential elections.
Judge Francis J. Ford, in a three paragraph opinion, ruled that in accordance with the opinion handed down last month by the U.S. Supreme Court invalidating Tennessee's one-year residency law, the Massachusetts requirement is illegal.
In a March decision, the Supreme Court held that the equal protection clause of the Fourteenth Amendment did not permit a state to deny the right to vote to "new residents" while allowing "old residents" to vote.
Want to keep up with breaking news? Subscribe to our email newsletter.